Fay Report Annex: DOD Interview re: Conditions at Abu Ghraib Detention Facility

Error message

Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $key is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1439 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

Interviewee arrived at AG on October 23, 2003 in order to conduct interrogation operations.
Interviewee recalled an incident in December where a dog was used during the interrogation of an Iraqi Police (IP) detainee.
Interviewee also noted that a detainee was bitten by a dog that same evening.

Doc_type: 
Interview
Doc_date: 
Tuesday, April 27, 2004
Doc_rel_date: 
Wednesday, March 2, 2005
Doc_text: 

SWORN STATEMENT •
For ase of this Ion. see AR 190-45; the proponent opener is OOCSOPS
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Title 10 USC Section 301; Title 5 USC Section 2951, E.O. 9357 dated November 22. 1943 IS111.
AUTHORITY. To provide commanders and law entorcanent °flows wild means by welch inlormauon may be accurately identified.
PRINCIPAL PURPOSE: Your social security number is used as an whitsonaUaltemate means of Identification to licking king and retrieval.
ROUTINE LJSES. Disci:we til your sucial security atirter is voluntary.
DISCLOSURE:
IME 4111111FE NUMBER
2. GATE IYYYYMMDIR
I. LOCATION
2004/04/271— 2200 Abu Ghraib, Iraq, APO AE 09335
7. GRADEJSTATUS
6. SSN
E. MIDDLE NAME
SGT
8. ORGANIZATION OR ADDRESS
66th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP, Deployed to Abu Ghraib Correctional Facility, Abu Ghraib, Iraq, APO AE 09335
9.
WANT TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT UNDER OATH:
I arrived at Abu Ghraib on 23 October 2003 to conduct interrogation operations. When I first arrived to Abu Ghraib, I received a tour of the facilities, screening area, the living Support Areas and all the work areas. I conducted a right scat ride with the individual I was replacing. I received the Interrogation Rules of Engagement (IROE) and signed the IROE. I really didn't have any questions. It was pretty clear what we could and could not do. I have never witness any abuse of detainees or photos of
Hard Site. An Iraqi police had managed
detainees by Ml personnel. I did see one instance where a military dog was used in the
was not erative and the

to provide a detainee in the hard site with a pistol. An interrogation was on going and the detain
happened in
dogs were used. The dog was in the cell with the detainee. The dog was close to the interpret is
be approved by higher command and I
December. 1 found out a detainee had been bitten that same night. This technique had to
a detail
was told this had been approved (the use of a dog). When we wanted to deviate from the approved IROEs had to
as inplan and get it approved by LTG SANCHEZ. COL Pappas was in charge and had control of operations and charge of the Interrogation Control Element. My belief was that BG Fast was in charge of the camp.
Q. Do you have anything to add to this statement?
A. No
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////End of Statement//////////////////WWWW//////////////////////////////iii///
11 IN N MAKING STATEMENT
10. EXHIBIT
PAGE 1 OF TPAGES
ADDITIONAL P.46f.S. MUST CONTAIN THE HEADING -STA TEMENT Of TAKEN AT Nay THE BOTTOM Of EACH ADDITIONAL PAGE MUST BEAR THE INITIALS OF THE PERSON MAKING THE STATEMENT, AND PAGE NUMBER MUST BE BE INDICATED
sure 111.00
DA FORM 2823, JUL 72, IS OBSOLETE

OA FORM 2823, DEC 1998
AGO 000651
DOD 000738


1

SWORN STATEMENT
For use of this form, Ha AR 190-45; the proponent agency is ODCSOPS
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Tilt. ID USC Section 301; Title 6 USC Section 2951; E.O. 9397 dated tiovember.22, 1943 ISSN).
..
AUTHORITY:
To provide commanders and law enforcement officials with means by which information may be accurately
PRINCIPAL PURPOSE:
Your social security number is used as an additional/alternate means of identification to facilitate filing and ninny&
ROUTINE USES: WANT TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT UNDER OATH:
DISCLOSURE • Disclosure of your social security numbs, is voluntary. 1. LOCATION 2. DATE IYYYYMMODI METRO PARK, SPRINGFIELD, VA 2004/05/23 3. TIME 4 FILE NUMBER
S. t NAME, MIDDLE NAME I 6. SSN 7. GRADE/STATUS SOT
B. ORGANIZATION OR ADDRESS 66th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP, DARMSTADT, GERMANY
9

I.
After regling about and seeing pictures of some of the incidents ofpossible detainee abuse on the interact I want to mention some recollections of matters I observed while assigned at Ahu Ghraib. The first pertains to a picture on the Internet of-a detainee with a hood over his head handcuffed to a railing on the top floor. (Lam not able to identify the detainee in the picture). I observed a similar incident on one occasion when I was in the area to pick up a detainee for interrogation. I observed a detainee hooded and handcuffed to a railing. I asked the MP what it entailed and was informed that since the MPs were short handed they often had to "park" a detainee somewhere if they could not immediately return him to his cell. I do not remember the identity of the detainee or the MP. I did not report this to anyone as the explanation by the MP was plausible td . w . practice due to the shortage of MPs. The second matter.pen.ains to a picture on the internes of a MP g next to a detainee Ina hallway. The detainee (reportedly) had a brown substance spread over his body. a detainee we c referred to as "shiny` because be would often defecate in his cell and throw the feces around. at time throwing it L mi
thlec31 s. (This particulio detainee appeared to act very strangely at times and might have bad a mental condition). On this particular occasion at • nucha 1 saw him sleeping on a mattress on the floor in the hallway. handcuffed and covered with a blanket. I asked the MP what was going on and was informed that the detainee had defecated in the cell, covered himself with feces and thrown feces around the cell and at the. MPs. The MPs had to take him to the showers to clean him up and clean his cell - that was shy he was sleeping on a mattress on the floor. Again I did not report this, as simile matters were a conimon occurrence with this particular detainee. A similar situation could have been the precipitation behind the photo on the Internet. The night of e a sou was t m to help with uardin of the Ira . Police were to keep them from talking In one anile and were tnerc as well When I arrived to the Ha a as the
person on site. c interrogators had been going on for 3-4 hours already. The dogs were being at time as well. There was one cell the dog went into. The dogs barked but as not cls enough to hurt the detainee. I do not remember who the interrogator was hut I do remember that the intcrprcicr a-The dogs were authorized before but by this time, any approval had to go through LTG Sanchez. During this panic r inci e , there was a sense of urgency to conduct simultaneous interrogations of tie police that had been identified as being involved and word circulated around that LTG Sanchez had givenblanket approval for somewhat harsher interrogation mctnods fur the police interrogations. (I did not sec any written blanket approval and do not remember any one individual specifically telling me that we had a blanket approval - it was Just accepted by all of us i During this time, there was an IP who was taken into isolation and into the shower mom to keep him away from the otherIPs. Her was lett there for about were directed to go back in with the IP. When we got to the cell, he was ta d one of the MPs ew a bucket of water to wake him up. I asked if this was necessary, he said
ted that the IP s alias ass and had to keep him awake. The IP was given a blanket to keep him warm.
also pertained to t occurred after the shooting incident, possibly two to three days after, where in a detainee bad a gun in his cell an it had t taken by force. We bad an informant (one of the detainees) who had tipped usto Iraqi police smuggling weapons and other contraband into the deumees so after the shooting incident, the Iraqi police ware
rounded up and put into cells. As ' • done, the informant pointed out which police anfirtolved and which were not. Ir. this parasol instance as working with a civilian interrogator I observed terrogating one Iraqiectoan and hemmed tureen comma into the cell and standing next to the detainee and standing outside the cell.rentle using the M as an inumidanon tactic with the detainee and would tell him to answer questions or he would bringk into the cell. At one point t his hands over the nose and mouth of the policeman, cutting off his air flow
an not allowing him to breathe. this Lasted for a ew seconds At er int his collapsible nightstick to push and possibly twist the policeman's arm causing some pain asked out o cell at one point he commented to methat lie knew how to do this without leaving any marks. Mit that statement I wondered why he eau say s h a
thing. I did not report the matter to anyone for two reasons. ust as an interrogator who knew the IROEs an as e SSG - therefore, both should have known whatwas allowed and what was not.
10 EXHIBIT 11. INITIALS or PERSON MAKING STATEMENT
I

PAGE 1 OF PAGES
ADDITIONAL PAGES MUST CONTAIN THE HEADING 'STATEMENT TAKEN AT DATED
THE BOTTOM OF EACH ADDITIONAL PACE MUST DEAR THE INITIALS OF THE PERSON MAKING THE STATEMENT, AND PAGE NUMBER MUST BE BE .1NDICATEC
A F ORM 2823, DEC 1998 DA FORM 2S23. JUL 72. IS OBSOLETE InIAM vaso

AG0000649
DOD 000736

DATED 2004/05/23
Springfield, VA
TAKEN AT
STATEMENT OF
(Continued)
9. STATEMENT ods
Second, it was commonly understood that LTG Sanchez had given blanket approval for somewhat bars inter the Iraqi police as a result of the shooting incident. The interpreter wi was
(not specified) for use a a trig an Army Colone in
The last matter concerns treatment of a detainee who was accused of s
supervisor was
the head (just wa ed up to on the street and shot him). The detainee was in an isolation cell and one or two MPs and a male dog handler with a leashed but unmuzzled dog outside the cell. The detainee was handcuffed to the cell door on the inside and the dog was allowed to jump up at the door and bark and snarl. The dog was on the leash at all times and was not allowed to get close enough to bite the detainee. I did not report this because it did not seem to be abuse. I do not remember the identify of any of the personnel involved. I mention these incidents at this time only as a result of reading and seeing pictures on the interne bringing the
matters to mind.
Q. Is there anything else yOu would like to add to this statement?
A.
AEFIDAviT
. HAVE READ OR HAVE HAD READ TO ME THIS STATEMENT
2 . I FULLY UNDERSTAND THE CONTENTS OF THE ENTIRE STATEMENT MADE
WHICH BEGINS ON PAGE 1. AND ENDS ON PAGE
BY ME. THF STATEMENT IS TRUE. I HAVE INITIALED AL.L. CORRECTIONS AND HAVE INITIALED THE BOTTOM OF EACH PAGE
CONTAINING THE STATEMENT I HAVE MADE THIS STATEMENT FREELY WITHOUT HOPE OF BENEFIT OR REWARD, WITHOUT
IHREAT OF PUNISHMENT, AND WITHOUT COERCION, UNLAWFUL INFLUENCE, OR UNLAWFUL. INDUCEMENT.

(Signature of Person Making Statement)
t.; WITNESSES
,2::tcr•...
V.\
(Signature of Person Administanng Oath)
ORGANZATION OR ADDRESS
.0111.11*n Administering Oath)
UCMJ. ARTICLE 136
(Authority To Administer Oaths)
ORGANIZATION OR ADDRESS.
INITIALS OF PERSON MAKING STATEMENT
PAGE.OF.PAGES

USAP^ V 1.00
PAGE 3, DA FORM 2823, DEC 1998
AG0000650
DOD 000737

Doc_nid: 
3122
Doc_type_num: 
73