This letter from Kenneth Roth the Executive Director of Human Rights Watch, to President Bush concerns a Washington Post article dated December 26, 2002 alleging of torture of suspected Al-Qaeda detainees held in U.S. custody. Mr. Roth states "if true, would place the United States in violation of some of the most fundamental prohibitions of international human rights law" and "Torture is never permissible against anyone, whether in times of peace or of war."
MSC MULTILAT
fa 002
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
'350 Mt: Ave, 34th Flom New York, NY 10118 Phone: 212-290-4700 • Fax: 212-736-1300 B-nail: Invinyeehmorg
WebSi..:hItp:/AVWW,hlw.arg
*petROI
toemetweihroW
14:11cieMesiltdcr
06,041111s afeakagfei Dfncyr
email Pato
Cindamdripim DS trapr
• er-ROW
;;;Aes IXTICAV
3shi "r. arm
Ar
nidiarDIrtemr
Galffslow
Means.
[awl**
°Mortara Dircaor
11301403loovil
Vigshingtat AIWA* MegrAW
Nal klaleme
Ilimay w
Oiiortfam• Pficbc.
Simon rrtrairroar
0001 Wargo'
Cameowissel
Ivader 'Nur
tegamdAdvaftelm
!nano Poi,*
UN Rarrcerrourtv
firm= DINSCTOR5
Pow Tiktnentiosaa
4iNca
kit Mturi Vim=
*wk.:
Deed Mpg
40,
tabalnI4 Ateregm
Wad ra Gould Arlo
Mom 110igity
•
NM* &a mid NostA Arno
Stow Cow (Maim Dinctat
AMP
tai Whialm
CliftholStets
USMida Rano
Ilisoreed WAY
BOARD Of DIRECTORS
kudos Psi=
Oar
Akta 1E1 Fan
MsAlaimo
Awa
(*Wiwi
=41
Cklime
Erma
vnaaaas
Vays GricsOlus
Mao IL Rh* umas tttrop. lr-acrillas Lia
Melo One &Owl
Wendt War
tatfterrisOly
I lug • Inay
clwroft icdh Whin
Swam gaikal-A '
'wird 11.1.Norrotbo
hoe Obas PortOmcs Ksibba Petra
Claurbiqnwstl
Pace 1146
SISAIR4414%
ry* &UM
amidiss Grua $* MUM Puska San S. tontclood salbig TdbardMenai Wit Wys 'Miry
rratenZ.,alftorin
rftwiffse croft .
RELEASED IN FULL
December 26, 2002
President George W. Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500
Dear President Bush:
Human Rights Watch is deeply concerned by allegations of torture and other mistreatment of suspected al-Qaeda detainees described in the Washington Post ("U.S. Decries Abuse but Defends Interrogations") on December 26. The allegatlons,'if true, would place the United States in violation of some of the most fundamental prohibitions of international human rights Jaw. Any U.S. government official who is directly involved or complicit in the torture or mistreatment of detainees, including any official who knowingly acquiesces in the commission of such acts, would be subject to prosecution worldwide.
Human Rights Watch urges you to take immediate steps to clarify that the use of
torture is not U,S policy, investigate the Washington Post's allegations, adopt all
necessary measures to end any ongoing violations of international law, stop the rendition of detainees to countries where they arc likely to be tortured, and prosecute those implicated in such abuse,
I. Prohibitions Against Torture
The Washington Post reports that persons held in the CIA interrogation centers at Bagram air base in Afghanistan am subject to "'areas and duress" techniques, including "standing or kneeling for hours" and iiing 'held in awkward, painful positions," The Post notes that the detention facilities at Bagram and elsewhere, such as at Diego Garcia, are not monitored by the International Committee of the Red Cross, which has monitored the U.S. treatment.of detainees at Guantbarno Bay, Cuba.
The absolute prohibition against torture is a fundamental and well-established precept of customary and conventional international law. Torture is never permissible against anyone, whether in times of peace or of war.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
REVIEW AUTHORITY: ARCHIE M BOLSTER
lit DOS-001159
DATE/CASE ID: 10 DEC,2PO4 200303827
UNCLASSIFIED
151WSSEL.3 crailIVA isoSG. CONG LONDON LOS ANGIUZS MOSCOW NSW YOUX SAN PAANCISCO WASHINGTON
• . -JAN. 2.2903. .4:217F" NSC
NO.913.
• P.4
MULTILPTUNCLAS SIFIED.
12/28/02 TRU 18:48 FAX 212 736 1300
L OOS
4841
The prohibition -against torture is firmly established under international human rights law. It is prohibited by various treaties to which the United States is a party, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which the United States ratified in 1992, and the Convention against Torture and Other Ctuel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which the United States ratified in 1994. Article 7 of the ICCPR. states that "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment." The right to be protected from tenure is non-derogable, meaning that it applies at 01 times, including during public emergencies or wartime.
International humanitarian law (the laWs of war), which applies during armed conflict, prohibits
the torture or other mistreatment of captured combatants and others in captivity, regardless of
their legal status. Regarding prisoners-of-war, article 17 of the Third Geneva Convention of .
1949 states: "No physical or. mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on
prisoners of war to secure from them information of any kind whatever. Prisoners of war who
refuse to answer may not be threatened, insulted, or exposed to any unpleasant or
disadvantageous treatment of any kind." Detained civilians are similarly protected by article 32
of the Fourth Geneva Convention. The United States has been a party to the 1949 Geneva
Conventions since 1955.
The United States does not recognize captured al -Qaeda members as being protected by the 1949 Geneva Conventions, although Bush administration officials have insisted that detainees will be treated humanely and in a manner consistent with Geneva principle*. However, at minimum, all detainees in wartime, regardless of their legal status, arc protected by customary international humanitarian law. Article 75 ("Fundamental Guarantees") of the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, which is recognized as restating customary international law, provides that "torture of all kinds, whether physical or mental" against "persons who are in the power of a • Patty to the conflict and who do not benefit from more favorable treatment under the [Geneva] Conventions," shall "remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever, whether committed by civilian or military agents." "[Ciruel treatment and torture" of detainees is also prohibited under common article 3 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, which is considered indicative of customary international law.
H. Passible U.S. Complicity in Torture
It is a violation of international law not only to use torture directly, but also to be complicit in torture committed by other governments. The Post reports being told by U.S. officials that"Mtn/sands have been arrested and held with U.S. assistance in countries knOwn .for brutal treatment of prisoners." The Convention against Torture provides in article 4 that.all acts of torture, including "an act by any person which constitutes complicity or participation in torture," is an offense "punishable by appropriate penalties which take into account their grave nature."
The Post article describes the rendition of captured al-Qaeda suspects from U.S. custody to other countries where they are tortured or otherwise mistreated. This might also be a violation of the Convention against Torture, which in article 3 states: "No State Party shall expel, returnCrefouler') or extradite a parson to another State where there are substantial groends for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.... For the purpose of
I'
2
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS-001160
12/26/02 • Tau 1a:49 FAX 212 736 1300 u LASS IF I E
detemiiliing whether there are such grounds,. the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights."
The U.S. Department of State annual report on human rights practices has frequently criticized torture in countries where detainees may have been sent. These include Uzbekistan, Paldstan, Egypt. Jordan and Morocco. The United States thus could out plausibly claim that it was unaware of the problem of torture in these countries.
111 International Prosecutions for Torture 'and Command Responsibility
Direct involvement or complicity in torture, as well as the failure to prevent torture, may subject
U.S. officials to prosecution under international law.
The willful torture or inhuman treatment of prisoners-of-war or other detainees; including • "willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health," arc "grave breaches" of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, commonly known as war crimes. Grave breaches are subject to universal jurisdiction, meaning that they can be prosecuted in any national criminal court and as well as any international tribunal with appropriate jurisdiction.
The Convention against Tckture obligates States Parties to prosecute persons within their
jurisdiction who are implicated or complicit in acts of torture. This obligation includes the prosecution of persons within their territory who committed acts of torture elseWhere and have not be extradited under procedures provided in the convention_
Should senior U.S. officials become aware of acts of torture by their subordinates and fail to take
'141' immediate and effective steps to end such practices, they too could be found criminally liable under international law. The responsibility of superior officers for atrocities by their subordinates is commonly knewn as command responsibility. Although the concept originated in military law, it now is increasingly accepted to include the responsibility of civil authorities for abuses committed by persons under their direct authority. The doctrine of command responsibility has been upheld in recent decisions by the international criminal tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda.
There are two forms of command responsibility: direct responsibility for orders that are unlawful and imputed responsibility, when a superior knows or should have known of. crimes committed by a subordinate acting on his own initiative and fails to prevent or punish .them. All states . are
obliged to bring such people to justice.
-
The allegations made by the Washington Post are extraordinarily serious. They have put the
United States on notice that acts of torture may be taking place with U.S. participation or
complicity. That creates a heightened duty to respond preventively. As an immediate step, we
urge that you issue a pre,sidontial statement clarifying that it is contrary to U.S. policy to Use or
facilitate torture. The Post's allegations should be investigated and the findings made public.
3
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS-001161
NO.913.
2 'Z3e34"3/3:" NSC '1"TR-1'1-UNCLASSIFIED P.6
L2/26,02 THU 18:40 FAX 212 736 1300
till D135
Should them be evidence of U.S. civilian or military officials being directly involved or complicit in torture, or in the rendition of persons to places where they are likely to be tortured, you should take immediate steps to prevent the commission of such acts and to prosecute the individuals who have ordered, organized, condoned, or carried them out. The United States also has a duty to refrain from sending persons to other countries with a history of torture without explicit and verifiable guarantees that no torture or mistreatment will occur.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Sine
KennethRoth
'
Executive Director
Cc: Colin Powell, Secretary of State
Donald Rumsfeld. Secretary of Defense
Condoleezza Rice, National Security Advisor
4
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS-001162