Internal FBI Email re: [No Subject]

Error message

  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::current() should either be compatible with Iterator::current(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::next() should either be compatible with Iterator::next(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::key() should either be compatible with Iterator::key(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::valid() should either be compatible with Iterator::valid(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::rewind() should either be compatible with Iterator::rewind(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).

The document is an internal FBI email, regarding an NCIS request to interview a Special Agent who was involved in the capture of a detainee who later died in custody. The email includes information on the procedure by which these investigations proceed.

Doc_type: 
Email
Doc_date: 
Wednesday, September 29, 2004
Doc_rel_date: 
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Doc_text: 

Wednesday, September 29, 2004 6:08 PM
I(DO) (FBI)"
L6
b7C
Message
.ALL 0 PS TI CM C7 -::--11',TED
I-71EIN IS UNCLASSIE--) •
DATE 07-22-2009 BY 65179 DI •11-1/11/r5 Page 1 of 3
TIDWELL, J STEPHEN (IR)'(FBI)
From: TIDWELL; ..1 STEPHEN (IR) (FBI)"
Sent:
To:
Subject: FW:
NON-RECORD
•FYI
Original Message--.--
From: BALD, GARY M: (CID) (FBI)
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 6:00 P1'.1
To: HARRINGTON, T J. (CTD) (FBI); CUMMINGS, ARTHUR M. (CTD) (FBI)
Cc:. PISTOLE, JOHN S. (DO) (FBI); TIDWELL, 3 STEPHEN (IR) (FBI); Caproni, Valerie E. (OGC) (FBI)
Subject: RE:
S
NO.NiECORD
TJ/Art - PIs give me •your thoughts and the status of policy papers. I have not seen them. Gary
----Original Message---
From: TIDWELL, 3 STEPHEN (IR) (FBI)
Sent•Wednesday, September 29, 2004 1:11 PM
.To: Caproni, Valerie E. (OGC) (FBI) . .
Cc: PISTOLE, JOHN S. (DO) (FBI); BALD, GARY. M. . CTD) (FBI)
Subject: RE:
SE VP^"Vi -
NOR-RECORD
We need to have NCIS come at this in a better manner. If INSD !Ills are going to have the liaison for this,
' there should be an understanding how•we 'are going'to do it with outside agencies.:
• lo On another related sidebarr7it is our understanding that the policy EC on SSEs is.working its way thru
CTD EM. Any ideas on.when will be coming out? 7C
in••••
Original Message----:
From: Caproni, Valerie E. (0Gc) (FBI)
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 12:24 PM
To: TIDWELL, J STEPHEN (IR) (FBI)
Cc: PISTOLE, JOHN S. (DO) (FBI); BALD, GARY M. (CTD) (FBI)
Subject: RE: '
SENsi ED
N-RECORD
• . • . .•
To my knowledge, they only come via 3rd -hand info . — NCIS t. to me. As the story . • b 6
Was relayed to me (which presumably is how NCIS relayed it t t e SA was in the dwelling of • b ic
the HVT when SF was "tuning him up." If that is wrong, then I have no reason to believe the SA
has any problem.
.3/2/2005
OIG REQ 2/18/05—PART 13
FBI018094CBT
. FBI0600049 DOJOIG012887
Message Page 2 of 3
My issue is that even if that story. were correct we are putting these agents in very untenable
positions: beating individuals before you arrest is unacceptable, but our agents are very much
dependent on the SF they are with for their own personal safety. Those dynamics make me
" uncomfortable.
----Original Message----
From: TIDWELL, J STEPHEN (IR) (FBI)
:

Sent: W d e tember 29, 2004 11:03 AM
• To: (DO) (FBI); PISTOLE, JOHN S. (DO) (FBI); Caproni, Valerie E. (OGC) (FBI);
BAL ,'GARY M. ft-TD) IFBI)
Cci I. (INSD) (FBI);I ((HRT) (FBI)
(ASD) (FBI) .
Subject: ye-
SEN
NON-RECORD
For info of all:
You can see the protocol below for reporting in the Afghanistan' and then OSC Bamford's
recollection.
Here's the background from SAI I. he was with the SF forcesthat captured the
suroLlourtion. After a raid, the subject was taken away for interrogation and as always,
SA along with the rest of the shooyers (SF to which he is attached) departed to
return to their base of operations. was not present or in the vicinity of the interrogation
that evidently led to the death of the subject He wrote, his after action. Some time later,
NCIS came to him with a written list of questions, in retrosapect he now realizes had to do
with the death in question, which he responded to." He has already been interviewed by.
NCIS. The NCIS investigator this time would not give him any info or say whether he is.a
target or not. spoke with the'Agents'Association attorney and based on that
conversation and the facts'above, he plans to talk with NCIS, today'.
I need to know from where the concerns came from that have been vooiced he might have a
.. failure to report problem and might be in trouble with .us.
Steve
----Original Message----
From: BAMFORD, WARRENT. (IR) (FBI)
Sent: TuesdaY, September 28, 2004.2
I(HRT) (FBI)
PM
To: TIDWELL, J STEPHEN (IR) (FBI);I
tHRT) (FBI)
Subject: RE: NUS intervigly request of SAI I
.56
b7C
M1LITTIFE04.-T=1:HICVCSV--
NQN.7.RacO_RP.
All agents in Afghanistan who participate in SSEs are required to.complete an after action
report (AAR) upon return. Within this MR, they note. times of departure and return.
information or items recovered, and any.pertinent or noteworthy activity. I thing I two • h 6
SSEs while I was there and he was out on a third and had not returned'when I left. On one of 57C
the SSEsI was asked by the military to provide answers to a set of questions that I
'believe are related.to the incident in question but I'm not sure without knowing additional .
details. 'So, in addition to the AAR, there may also be a second document describing his '
.actions and what he saw. " •
3/2/2005 FBI018095CBT
OIG REQ 2/18/05PART 13 . F3310000050
)7 C
7C
DOJOIG012888
Message Page 3 of 3
3/2/2005 FBI018096CBT
OIG REQ 2/18/05—PART 13 DOJOIG012889 prurnnannsi

Doc_nid: 
11668
Doc_type_num: 
67