Internal FBI Email re: HVD-1

(00C) (FBI)
05-27-2010
CLASSIFIED BY 65179 DNH/xjs
PEASON: 1.4 P: SDurce)
DECLASSIFY CN: 05-27-2035
.1
PriesejilIChris .
V'YednesHAv FehruArd18 96n4 7.m ANA
I I
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED .
HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED EXCEPT
WHERE SHOWN OTHERWISE
We are ok with Tight?
hi
Original Message . . . . ••
Date: 02 18 2 07:21. am -0500 (Wednesday)
From:
To: M C ris Briese; 1
CC:
Subject: Re: RE: HVD-1'
• . Chris hi
Original Messale
Fromi
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 338 PM
• To: Briese, M Chris •
Cc:
: rwu:
FBIO23556CBT
Original Message -
. Date: • 02j17/2004 02:31 pm -0500 (Tuesday)
Froth: M Chris Briese
F31000052 . . - - OIG-REQ 02/18/05 -PART 9
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject: - • I-wd: He: RE: HVD-1
b6
h7c
Chris
Great - I
Based on your. note I will give them the OK,
>> M Chris Briese 02/18 6:38 AN ›.»
istheDeputy-OGC. .It seems. clear to me that-ye-can disaem
then dissem to. anyone they deem has a need to - know.
>>> 102/17' 4..7.g PM ??> ,_..."• . : . . ,
(S) . Actua y Ito disseminate the.infortatIon',icquii-ed by'the":F1337In"che
debriefs. Bottom line is significant "intel needs to be disseminated by- someone and it's
not good enough to just dissem to one agencY, ...' . •' b6
Vic,
»,1 102/17 3:58 13M» . . . .
1
I-- maybe I'm reading‘thi's.wrong (it's happened), but it' looks to me as though it's.
'these folks ar e unclear on 7- on the contrary, they seam to know they .
can , c,controi it' I It's FBI's role aS a.disseminator that they seem .
to
see.
, get, no?. . . • . . .
- it is clear from this note that the people involved do .not understand
the intelligence_mission-of the,FBI1 I I think someone seniorperhaps
EAD Eaginski, needs to get in the s. The issue is not whether or
not we can share this--information-i_________ The issue is whether we can 'share
with the intel,.law enforcement,an policy cOmmunities. We need to get
clarity ASAP. If livp-1 started talking abdut the location of WMD or
information imnanl- incr nn force protection it is not enough for this agency to -
land fulfilled our responsibility. Who is getting '
the into to the wartighter? Under this arrangement no one is. Who isl
1
( S)
(S)
(S) salt'
.b1
I b6
1.D7c ,
b6
b7C,
101
DOJOIG013186
To:
CC:
Subject: Fwd: HVD-1 .
I spoke to
FILshort,
he said that there .should be "No impediment" to—sharing information
at the DAG's office this .morning concerning the dissemination icqnp
(S)
biT
b7C '
b6
b7C
b1
Fyi, pass to anyone that needs to know.
Original Message
' Date: 02/17/20(14 nqi•59 agr-0500 . (Tuesday)
. — From: I I - .
To: Bald. Gary M Iiese. M Chris, Caproni. Valerie. E.
CC: I
Subject: HVD-1
(S) Hopefully, this contact with the DAG is sufficiently clear to end this issue.
me know.
If not let.
bi
b6
b
1D5 Per DAG
FBIO23557CBT
OIG-REQ 02/1e/057PART 9 FBI0000563 DOJOIG013187