The document is an internal FBI email, regarding a Post article on Guantanamo as well as the FBI's position on monitoring meetings between the detainees and their attorneys.
Message
DATE: 01-12-2010
CLASSIFIED BY 65179 DMH/rnis
REAS CN: 1.1 (c)
DECLASSIFY ON: 01-12-2035 Page 1 of 2 _ 1
ALL 7NFORMATI07 CONTAINED
HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED EXCEPTSHO:
L _Jur=
Caproni, Valerie E. (OGC) (FBI)
From: Caproni, Valerie E. (OGC) (FBI)
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 12:04 PM
To:
Subject: RE: FYI GTMO
WACI=RIPIT.-64e
NON-RECORD
bl
b6
-b7C.
S
I agree. If DOJ wants to listen for their reasons, they should take the. PR heat for it.
Original Message
. From:I
Sent: Tuesday; August 17, 2004 10:40 AM
To: Caproni, Valerie E. (OGC) (FBI)
Subject: RE: FYI GTMO
S\IS ZIg1J-T--IT1
NON-RECORD IFI5P
Post's article•said it was a DOJ attorney. I guess I.didn't want to get into the details other than to say my
opinion that we should defer to DOJ on this one unless we object to their advise.
Ll
h 6
b7C
(5)
efiginal•Message
From: Caproni, Valerie E. (OGC) (FBI)
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 9:10 AM
Tol
Subject: RE: FYI GTMO
MaM;MEBizff-4Nc:WaIM
NON-RECORD
• bl
• b6
•
• b7C
This issue•as in the paper this morning. I don't recall if it said DoD was asking
permission to listen or DoJ was.
Original Message
•Frorrul
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 8:44 AM
To: Caproni, Valerie E. (OGC) (FBI)
Subject: FYI GTMO
for b7C
(5 )
' hi
big
•V nNA(-St...
NON-RECORD •
called yesterday with a question about FBI's position Concerning monitoring (I assumed
tape recording) meetings between the detainees and their attorneys. I think that the issue is b6
likely mooted by the fact thati of the position that FBI doesn't need to request it for b ic
any of its purposeS and DOD is likely to do it anyway. I told that DOJ is heavily •
involved in GTMO and that if the issue became live, DOJ should decide.
OIG—REQ 02/18/05 —PART 13
FBIO24415OBT
DOJOIG013473 FBI0000110
Message
Facie 2 ot
'SEN FEED
SENSI 17r.v.: - a—nal SIFTED
OIG,-REQ 02/18/05-PART 13
FBIO24416CBT
HST0000111
DOJOIG013474
12,1
b6
1:7C
Original Message
Fromi
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 8:44 AM
To: Caproni, Valerie E. (OGC) (FBI)
Subject: FYI GTMO
FBIO24417CBT
01'41-44(25 02/18/65—PART 13 F3310000112
111-101 D
I D
rage NI
CLASSIFIED BY 55179 DE11/10
, : 1.4 (o)
DECLASSIFY ON: 01-12-2035
Caproni, Valerie E. (OGC) (FBI)
From: Caproni, Valerie E.. (OGC) (FBI)
Sent:
To:
Subject: RE: FYI GTMO
S ESN
NON-RECORD
b6
This issue was in the paper this morning. I don't recall if it said DoD was askin I for permission to listen or b7C
DoJ was., •
called yesterday with a question about FBI's position concerning monitoring (I assumed tape
recording) meetings between the detainees and their attorneys. I think that the issue is likely mooted by
the fact that' is of thecrosition that FBI doesn't need to request it for any of its purposes and DOD is.
likely to do it anyway. I told Ithat DOJ is heavily involved in GTMO and that ifthe issue.._. bec..a..._m e live, _....
Da.1-estiouTd decide. .
b6
b7
ALL INFCRMATION CONTAINED
HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED EXCEPT'
WHERE SHONN OTHERWISE
bl
b6
b7C
Tuesday, August 17, 2004 9:10 AM
DOJOIG013475