The document is an internal FBI email regarding the ACLU's FOIA litigation related to the treatment of foreign detainees and the release of relevant FBI documents and emails.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED
HEREIN IS TINCLAS:-.71IFIED
DATE C4-21- '1310 EY 65179 s •
. . -. . , . , .
From /0-4FBI/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE ,Ga0UP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=VECAPRONI:
:Microsoft'Mail Internet.Headers.Versitn 2-.0 - .• .
...content-ciassurnrcontent-claises:Message ' -. .
Subject:' RE: ACLU FOIA Litigation regarding•the'Treatmentof Foreign- Detainees
:bate: Mon; 28 Fel:1'2005_16:12:5i -0500 . , ,. ::
Message-I
4
1
XS-Has-A ,...,,....
I
X-MimeOLE: Pr aucea by microsott'Exchange V6;0.6487.1 %.
"From: "Canroni. E '-(0GC):'(FBI)"
To: (DO) '11(OGA) " I
(INSD)(Ybi).
Cc.:."P STOLE; JOHN S.c (DO) (
(DO) -(FBI)"
OGC.
I(D0),(FBI)71
:'X-Text: 2821
TIED'
N-RECORD'.
. ,
Based on my ,conversation, with I, suspect there area riUmber- Of:pMail's.
. ..
that have not been produced. Tinck they 'got very little,frot. CTD,. which
explained'theabgenCe of email by inciaking:TrilogY- I_ asked:'the-:FOIA attOrne,
to go talk to them again :and to findoutwhen theyiWerAtrildgized.-. I-hAve," :email from CTD'people'injqay 2004 (which Would ;pick up email triggered ,by: e %,- y.th , .Abu-Ghraib situation),that are 'clearly post Trilogy -If, as' 'I suspectr -CTD :really needs to for responsive docs 'fora,ACLU'request,..
=:-my suggestion-would be that lemail not be produced alpne butbe,produced:'
with anything else that-falls out of the tree.
((II., just looked through my detainee email file; and althougn,I Am
seen that emaiI. before( I.cannot•,find it in my-,,folder,)
• . .. . , .... . , - .
Original Mesane ,...
--From:1 I (DO), (OGA) , •
', Sent:- Monday, February 28, 2065 3:52 PM
To: Caproni, Valerie E. ,(0GC) (''FBI),4 1 -(INSD)•(FBI);,
-cc: PISTOLS, JOHN S.• (DO) (FBI);1 .
[(DOI (FBI).' ,.' --',.
-Subject: FW: ACLU FOIA Litigation regarding the Treatment of, Foreign Detainee's
. -. .
•
positive
I,(DO) (FBI)
2
b6
MIME-Version:
Content-Type: application/ms-tnef;"
.hame="Winmail.dat"
- ..Content-Transfer-Encbding: binary •
)(.-MS,---TNEF-COrreiator:1
Thread-Topic:.ACLU FOIA regarding the Treatment of Foreign,
.Detainees
Thread-Index:
REQ/ IVO4-t*RT (po .E.49aUb955
., • „ . :' -
ails-were not,pro_d uced .i n the FOIA' litigation,`: according to
in RMD. ' - .
indicates her that RMD'intends to' review'the_emails'andthen,release.
them in the FOIA cese.I'massuming that's consistent with FOIA law.and •.
practice, but I think, we ought:to make sure that we-have addressed all the
iseues'We discussed:this morning, such as whether there. are other responsive
b6
documents that have not been ,produced. • .
- ,
' Oricknal Me'ssam.
From: l
Sent: .Mond
To:
. Cc:
' (RMD) (FBI);
URM.O4:v)-,. (FBI)
28, 2005.1:20. PM
(DO') (OGA) '-. •
(OGC) (FBI);I l(RMD) .(FBI)A
l(RMD) -(FBI); I(RMD) (FBI)
SubjeCt: ACLU FOIA Litigation :regarding the Treatment of Foreign Detainees
%I have reViewedthe two E-Mails that you.provided'on. 2/28./05 anddiave-'.
determined that:
both -E-Mails are -responsiveto%this FOLA- litigation.inbOth content:an
.time frame and
., .
' )p). neither. of these E-Mailshas.been•previously'proceased for release to
,
the ACLU 'pursuant to this litigation.'- ' '
. .,.
Therefore,, these .two E-Mails.wili be ;a•) reviewed, current ciasSificition,
,,and by:processed for any releasable information pursuant tp the FOIA. 'Any '
'such .: ,
-non-exempt, releasable information will then be 'provided to the ACLU pursuant
to this litigation.'" ' _ , , „., , .. -' . -
b7C
a) both E-Mailsare
,:time frame and • .
responsive to this FOIA litigation in both-content and
b) neither of these E.-Mails'has been
the ACLU pursuant to this litigation.
•-‘ ."
Therefore, these.twb'E-Mails, will be a
•
previoUslY- prooessed,for releaseltp
.•,
reviewed 'for.Curient classification, n
0/15/05—P, ART
D0JODIGO1'3957
- FrOm /O=FBI/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=
,From: /0=FBI/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTSJCN
To: /O=FBI/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE,,
GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=VECAPRONI- (5=FBIJOU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE.
GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN /0=-FBI/OD=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE,
GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN 0=FBI/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE
" 'GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JPiStole;/0=FBI/OU=FIRST'ADMINISTRATIVE
.,.GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN
" Subject: ACLU,FOIA'Liti ati regarding the. Treatment of FOreign
Sent: 2005-02-28
Date:, 200'5-02-28
"X-Folder: DO
:',X-Text: 1572
SE tSTTT~12=9517T--eflierilkSSZEI.E.D
NON-RECORD "
ails were not produced in the FOIA litigation,' according to
, • ...
• . . •
indicates here that RMD intends to review the emaili and.then'release;:'..
them in the FOIA case. .I'm, assuMing•that's consistent with FOIA law and
practice, but I think we ought to make sure that we have,addresSed allthe'
-issues we disCussed this' morning,- such as whether. there'are Other.responsiVe
documents that have not been produced. '
- " •
I
b2
Detainees:
b7C
b6
" 7C
•
From:r ' I (RMD), ,(FB-1)-
ricinal MACCAMQ
Sent:. Monday,,February-28,12005,1:20 BM:
.—Tol l'opor.(o.pg).:
pc:1 1.(0Gc) (FBI):1
(RMD), (FBI);I L(RMD)'(FBI)';
'.subject: .A C. LU FOIA,Litigation,regarding the-Treatment
I (RMD)
-de Foreign Detainees ,.
D) (FRI-) • I
.1 have reviewed' thetwo E-Mails.that you provided on 2/28/05.and' haVe:
:determined that: •
„ * .
'and b) processed for' any` relea.s able information pursuant - to the-FOIA. Any
to ,-the AL1r.iljpursuant
. sdch-,.. . , - .
",non-exemPt, releasable information. will, then 'be provided
. .
:to this litigation. ' '. - ,. .
.
. .
,
FBI035925CBT
OIG REQ 'FiiMISTgA13958