Internal DoD Email re: Problems [Redacted]

Error message

  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::current() should either be compatible with Iterator::current(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::next() should either be compatible with Iterator::next(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::key() should either be compatible with Iterator::key(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::valid() should either be compatible with Iterator::valid(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::rewind() should either be compatible with Iterator::rewind(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).

The document is an internal Department of Defense email, regarding a lack of protected communication that is hindering the process of true assessment at the BIAP facility.

Doc_type: 
Email
Doc_date: 
Monday, June 14, 2004
Doc_text: 

Subject: Problems
CLASSIFICATION:. S
CAVEATS: NOFORN
TERMS: NONE .
(S)
DATE: 08-11-2011
'CLASSIFIED BY 65179 DMH/MJS
REASON: 1.4 (C)
DECLASSIFY ON: 09-11-2036
b3 10 USC 130b'
From: b6 per DoD
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 1 :49 AM HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED EXCEPT
To: WHERE SHOWN OTHERWISE
Cc:
bl per DoD
'
Gentlemen,
Last Friday MAJI 'requested mess with BG Ennis,
b3 10 USC 130b
b6 per DoD
land me to attend the meeting with the general.'
I
Maj was unavailable and I attended.
I still need the justification documentation that outlines why we support the billets ors the matrix.
tus concerning the PACOM and Sudan billets? Who is coordinating forthese billets? . . •
bl per DoD • •
V•zuagtigtite.ii--to one of burguy.syre.ttli

'•
• •
• ,Is your conversation being 'monitored? •
• If I could get you transferred to the (SG and out of your current location/ duty would you want that to
happen?• . •
The response to both questions was ye,s. I asked our. guy to do an informal survey of our. folks out there and ask
the second question. . b3 10 USC 130b
,1 received.a response on my voice.mail, the answer was: four x yes, one x no. . • .
b6 per Do.D..
Today I talked to our guy aain, he said that he had received an email fro rom our new boss; I
guess he is referring to Co he way that email was handled means.that tth e F knows its content. Ac
,to our guy, all email goes, into a common t and can/are being read by the TF. He emphasized that
had no visibility on what is going on at t ur guy did not feel that he 'could answer that email honest y •ue,
to the lack of protected communication. I as e im if he thought it would be better for honesty's sake if, he and '
our other guys could talk to someone away from the compound, i.e. the ISG and he said yes, that would be the
only way. . bl per DoD
, .
I told him not to answer the email and that) would talk to the HAT chain of command back here explaining the •
situation. '
I think we need to take all possible steps to allow our guys to give us their assessment of what is happening out
there. We have two very experienced operators at that facility, if they are telling us that they'do.nottrust the way
communications are being handled.right now we need to give them the opportunity to talk to us openly and •
directly. . .
I think it is not in our interest to send people to backfill these positions. until we have taken corrective action to '
' remedy the situation at'BIAP. .
FBI031116CBT
,0 44)840 8 /22/05—ITEM #25 .nsioanoli
Col
Wh
DOJOIG014020
r BUIL
31X1.RE:i.
,b3 10 USC 130b
'b6 per DoD
dLASSIFICATION:> CAVEATS: NOFORN
. ,
TERMS: NONE
•,:t:t• •
FBI031117CBT
_OIG q4.42a4/22/05=-ITEM #25 'FB10000020
DOJOIG014021

Doc_nid: 
11434
Doc_type_num: 
67