Emails between FBI Officials re: Department of Defense's Policy Against Abuse or Torture of Detainees

Error message

  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::current() should either be compatible with Iterator::current(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::next() should either be compatible with Iterator::next(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::key() should either be compatible with Iterator::key(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::valid() should either be compatible with Iterator::valid(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::rewind() should either be compatible with Iterator::rewind(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).

Email between FBI officials discussing alleged DoD abuse. Email refers to Donald Rumsfeld's public statements, where he stated the DoD was against hooding, threats of violence and humiliation. The author follows that: "I know these techniques were approved at high levels w/in DoD and used on [Redacted] and [Redacted]. Additionally, DoD portrayed themselves as FBI agents in the same time frame these 'interrogation techniques' were employed on at least [Redacted]"
Contents redacted.

Doc_type: 
Email
Doc_date: 
Wednesday, May 5, 2004
Doc_rel_date: 
Sunday, February 5, 2006
Doc_text: 

Message Page 1 of 2
- '
b6 (IR) (FBI)
-a
b7c
From: r 1(0N13) (FBI)
Sent Wednesday, May 05, 2004 8:50 AM b6 -1
IDivI3 To:
b7C -1
Cc; iv13) (FBI Iv00) (FBI); R) (FBI)
Subtem RE: Detainee abuse claims
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED NON-RECORD
ALCOR,
techniques
Based on Rumsfeld's public statements, DoD is against hooding prisoners, threats of violence and meant to humiliating detainees ( is a 41altiese I have seen). I know these techniques were approved at high levels wan DoO and usedAniiiJ Additionally, DoD portray Was as FBI agents in the b6 -1,1 same time frame these "interroga echniques" were employed on at An EC outlining these
DoD techniques was done by MLDU in November 2003 es to FBI's Mesa hese DoD "interrogation
b7C -1, 4
techniques", regardless of whether they were approved by the pewlir Secretary Defense. DAD Harrington has terested in following up on this. The EC regarding as not been uploaded and I provided
th another copy of it when I left GTMO on March 30, 2004 so it could go thru the OGC chain. w ere does that stand?
b6 -1
SSAA
CTIJORS/MLDU b7C JEH, Room 5382
b2 -1.
DivI3) (FBI)
I AM
(FBI I(D)v13) FBI); ( DivI3 Div13) g iloS -1
Dtv09) (FBI)4 1 b7c -1
R) (FBI) : • : Detainee abuse claims Importance: High

We need to be very careful here. Everyone should pay particular attention to the distinctions between allegations of abuse and the use of techniques which fall outside of FBI/D03 training and policy. As I stated in my email yesterday, I am not aware of any credible allegations of abuse by
anyone in GTMO.
As it relates to1 lind Eat techniques employed against them in the interrogation
-0
process were, based on numerous inquiries I made, in addition to my personal review of the DOD

b7C -4
interrogation plans, approved by the Deputy Secretary of Defense.
ia.+4
9/26/2004
DETAINEES-2715

DOJFBI-003592

Message Page 2 of 2
b6 -4 Oyaehavioral Assessment Unit (BAU) disagreed with the use of specific techniques in the case
ot_jas they opined that the techniques would not be successful and they could produce

,b7C -4
unreliable results. BAU did not make any allegations of abuse that I am aware of.
Frog '1,13) (FBI)
Se

ib6 -1
Div13) (Fall tDiv13) fl B1)1 b7C -2
C.
Subject: Detainee abuse claims
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
NON-RtCORD rjaglink of two specific exampie&....you may want to talk to BAU Owl
I
in GTIVIO. b6 -4 b7C SENSITIVE BUT UNCL,A451F1ED
wisrnyx BULUNO,ASSIFIED
• 9/26/2004
DETAINEES-2716

DOJFBI-003593

Message Page 1 of 2

1(IR) (FBI) b6 -1
b7C -1
BI)
b6 -1
b7C -1
Cc: (Divl 3) (FBI Div09) (FBI); (IR) (FBI)
Subject: RE: Detainee abuse claims
Once again, I would refer you to my comments below. FBI disapproval of DOD techniques and alleging abuse of detainees are two vastly different issues.
FYI - the Navy IG is arriving in GTMO today to conduct an independent inquiry of the operation here.
---Otinal Messave--
From I(Div13) (FBI) Scat: ed 51512004 II;50 AM To ivI3) (FIN) 13)(FBI); rbIS -1
DivI3 I DivI3XFBIll E..... I ,17C -1 (Div13) (FBI) Div09) (FBI) lit) (FBI) Subject: RE: Detainee abuse claims
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
NON-RECORD

ALCON, Based on Rumsfeld's public statements, DoD is against hooding prisoners, threats of violence and
techniques meant to humiliating detainees (there is a list of the I know these. techniques ware approved at high levels Win DoD and used o Additionally, DoD portrayed themselve I agents in the same time tame these nterrogation techniques" were
b4 -14p

employed on at least An EC outlining these DoD techniques was done by MLDU In November 2003
b7C -2,4pas to FBI's dIssaprov o ese DoD "interrogation techniques', regardless of whether they were approved by the Depute( Secretary Defense. DAD Harrington has also be n in tad in following up on this. The EC regarding has not been uploaded and I provided AG with another copy of it when I left GTMO onrch 30, 2004 so It could go thru the OGC chain. re does that stand?
b6 -1
55/4
CTD/ORS/MLDU b7C -1
J'EN, Roam $382
b2 -1

-----Original Message--
(Div13) (FBI)
05, 2004 2 AM

b6 -1
(D1v13) I(01y13) (FBI); I(DIvI3XFBI); b7C -1
9126/2004
DETAINEES-2717
DOJFBI-003594

Doc_nid: 
5820
Doc_type_num: 
67