Emails discuss detainee abuse at Guantanamo Bay. In the original message, the author states that they observed aggressive treatment that was personally upsetting to the author, they added that treatment was perpetrated by military personnel and government contractors.
NO.704.
JUN.27.2006 4:36PM
fig Page 1 oft
• JSEIXEI • P.E
••¦ (NSW (FBI)
IBM
To: (BC (M
Subject Mt 511.42
Menhir:ft 114100theetrourtasporiseandencetharesportsesarecompletad. adetermittatto&evillbemadereference the inteniews.
-Inst M
Proll1:=11111111== ( 6) CP51)
• WI" er I Daft Mee 3u 2!0410:10 AM bal C I Ty: CINSD)
Zulus=
4111111EDVAIILIMUJMFAI
mow.Recen
bca -t mr.
I ant responding to your requatt for feedback on aggressive treatment and aperwindow technique used on dealings at GTMO. t del obserAitteaMent *awes not only egressive.
but personalty way upsetting, although I =Mazy that this Vestment was perpetrated by
Bureau
@MIDAS& t seamed these tech um were being employed by tne mititary, government contract
employee (9
My name 4 fiAll111111111 Boston 014don, EDD
currently assigned to Squad C4.
telephone (711
IsENSITNE Eng UNC.411iFtep
DATE:
CLASgFIEDBY:
),
'REASON: 1A( 3.o 3
DECLASSIFY ON: IP
AU. INFORMATION CONTAIN5_, HEREIN. IS UNCUSSIF . ED EXLAFT .
WHERE SHOWN OTHERWISE.
a. AR 154 triMO !mitigation
j
SE6kET ha* et7tEdlibits
7/12/2004
DOD057572
DOD JUNE 3765
3766
DOD057573