<p>Email references a media query directed towards Lt. Gen. John R. Vines for information about the rationale for determing certain detainees as "Ghost detainees" in Afghanistan and Persons Under Control (PUC) and High Value Targets (HVTs).</p>
7,Aessage Page 1 of 2 CYNciaK5 31"( -kiarytts ralach 111111Mlf 6 V tht tz iiv 5- btro.h.' 1%11/.9(6From: PAOMM. Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 5:38 PM To: McNeill, Dan K GEN - FORSCOM CG Cc: SJA; OL - PAO; OL - CG - PAO; 1AJ - PAO OL OCPA; G OCPA, C OCPA Subject: Media Query: PUC HVTs Importance: High V/R Deputy Chief of Public Affairs HQ USA Forces Command 404 Original Message From A] Sent: Thursday August 26, 2004 4:54 PM Tolrillit PAO Subje : FW: PUC HVTs Importance: High FYI From: [mailto krwashington.com ] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 3:53 PM Toall.1111000L;a111.11111pbracig.army.mil Subject: FW: PUC HVTs Importance: High Ori final Message From: [mailto krwashington.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 3:51 PM To: Subject: PUC HVTs Importance: High Cols I'd like to talk to Lt. Gen. John R. Vines about the PUC HVTs (aka "ghost detainees") that he approved 066877 /1-6g/P7 No DODDOA 026291 Message. Page 2 of 2 while he was commander in Afghanistan and what the rationale was for hiding those prisoners from the ICRC. I know the General approved of at least a handful of PUC HVTs, and I am going to report that fact. I also believe that the Army had a good rationale for creating the category of "persons under control, high value targets" and I would like to give the General the opportunity to fully explain that rationale. My editors want this story right away, but are willing to give me until Friday 16:00 to get comments. Best regards, MEM fe t. 000878 11/1/2004 'V) DODDOA 026292