Email from Sara Stryker to William B. Taylor and Timothy E. Wilder re: Ambassador Khalilzad's Comments on Detainee Abuse Allegations

Error message

  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::current() should either be compatible with Iterator::current(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::next() should either be compatible with Iterator::next(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::key() should either be compatible with Iterator::key(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::valid() should either be compatible with Iterator::valid(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::rewind() should either be compatible with Iterator::rewind(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).

Email between Jennifer Vlau, Sara Stryker and Jeremy Caddel concerning a Reuters article on U.S. Amb. Khalilzad conducting a review of Afghan jails in response to abuse allegations.

Doc_type: 
Email
Doc_date: 
Tuesday, May 18, 2004
Doc_rel_date: 
Thursday, December 16, 2004
Doc_text: 

UNCLASSIFIED

A390

Caddis!, Jeremy D
From: Stryker, Sara A

RELEASED IN FULL
Sent:: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 10:52 AM To: Taylor, William B (SA); Wilder, Timothy E
Cc: Caddel, Jeremy ID
Subject: Zal Khalilzad comment: US conducts "top-to-bottom" review of Afghan jails
We alerted PA and offered to comemnt, if need be, on this Reuters story, below.
As we have consistently said the investigation is a DOD matter, I don't think a comment is requred from the spokesman.
Do you agree?
----Original Message--From::Vlau, Jennifer L
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 10:14 AM To: LW-Mahogany; SES-O_Shift-II; LW-Afghanistan; SES-O_Shift-II; PAPress_Officers Subject:US conducts 'top-to-bottom" review of Afghan Jails
BC-AFGHAN-USA:ABUSES (PICTURE)
US conducts "top-to-bottom" review of Afghan jails
By Mike Collett-White
KABUL, May 18 (Reuters) - The U.S. military, stung by allegations of prisoner abuse at Afghan detention
centres, is conducting a "top-to-bottom" review of its secretive network of jails, the American ambassador said on Tuesday. The United States leads around 20,000 troops in Afghanistan hunting at Qaeda and Taliban militants. It has already said it changed procedures at its prisons following the deaths of two Afghans in U.S. custody 18 months ago. Further modifications have been made following feedback from the International Committee of the Red Cross, the only independent body allowed into its main prison for militant suspects at Bagram air base, just north of Kabul. But the latest comments by Zalmay Khalilzad in Kabul suggested the review could be far-reaching. "We have launched investigations and are in the process of thoroughly reviewing detention facility conditions and interrogation guidelines," he told a news briefing. Two investigations were launched last week into separate allegations. In one case, a former Afghan police officer complained he had been beaten and sexually abused during around 40 days in U.S. custody in 2003.
"We are going to investigate when allegations are made and do the right thing, and we're also doing a top-to­bottom look at detention centres, and also we are making sure that everybody understands what the guidelines are," Khalilzad added.
JUSTICE SEEN TO BE DONE The U.S. military has acted swiftly in response to the latest Afghan allegations, having seen its campaign in Iraq undermined by similar abuses at a jail near Baghdad. But many Afghans point out that an investigation into two deaths at Bagram in December 2002, both caused by repeated beatings to the victims' legs, has yet to be concluded. "The investigation that has been launched is a welcome step," Jawed Ludin, spokesman to President Hamid Karzai, told a separate briefing. "We also emphasise that (that investigation) should also be speedy and comprehensive and if that determines that abuses have taken place by certain people we expect that the course of justice should follow."
Khalilzad said incarceration and questioning were inevitable as the U.S. pursued its "war on terror," but added:
"While that mission is vital, it's equally important that we do this with the clear understanding that an equally important mission is to help the Afghan people stand on their own feet, to build a normal country. "Our military must trust Afghans with respect, with due consideration." There are no plans to change the status of detainees in Afghanistan, who the U.S. says do not come under the
Geneva Convention that protects the rights of prisoners of war because they did not fight in uniform or represent a country.
John Sifton, Afghan expert at Human Rights Watch, said this week that the abuse of detainees in Afghanistan had diminished since the immediate aftermath of the Taliban's defeat late in 2001, but fresh allegations continued to come to light.
"The biggest complaint (now) is lack of legal process and the complete lawlessness of their detention, with no family visits, no legal council and being kept without being charged," he said. (Additional reporting by Yousuf Azimy)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVIEW AUTHORITY: SHARON E AHMAD
22 DOS-002190
DATE/CASE ID: 30 NOV 2004 200303827
UNCLASSIFIED

Doc_nid: 
6567
Doc_type_num: 
67