An email including a chain of forwarded emails regarding possible allegations of abuse being made against FBI agents by the military.
Message
FOGLE, TONI M. (INSD) (FBI)
From: ~CTD) (FBI)
Sent: Thursday, July 22,20043:12 PM
To: FOGLE,TONI M. (INSD) (FBI)
Subject: RE: aPR
UNCLASSIFIED
NON-RECORD
AL L INFOPRATI ON CO,rrAINED
HEPE IN IS CLA SI IED
DATE 03 - 1 3 -2009 BY 65 17 9 DI1H / 15c
Page 1 of2
b6
b7C
Toni: The comment that our agents abused the prisoners was a statement made by DAD Harrington to me a few
weeks ago, presumably in response to a referral the military had made to you. I never saw the military's referral.
We (IT08-2) knew about this prisoner's allegation that he was abused by the military. Prior to this specific
allegation we reviewed all our intervew 302s of Iraq detainees to see if any allegations of abuse were made to the
interviewing agents. None were made. It was our position that if the military asked for the 3025 we would give
them up, but would not support the military interviewing the agents (letting the 302 stand on its own).
It appears to me that DAD Harrington might not have been given the full story. Thank you for looking into this and
we'll send the 302's in response to the request. Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: FOGLE, TONI M. (INSD) (FBI)
Sent: Thursday, July 22,20042:24 PM
To: I P-D) (FBI)
Cc: HARRINGTON, T J. (em) (FBI)j MCCRAW, STEVEN c. CINSD) (FBI);IL....- lcOivl0
- TOY/aPR) (FBI)~ I(INSO) (FBI)
Subject: RE: aPR
UNCLASSIFIED
NON-RECORD
b 6
b7C
Tom, I spoke wit~ ~SSA, liS) who has oversight over this matter. It's my understanding b6
that an allegation was made by a prisoner regarding possible' abuse. It is also my understanding that the b 7C
Agents you identified were not accused of that abuse -- but were among many who had contact with the
prisoner during that time period. Finally, it's my understanding that Army CID was taking the lead on that
investigation, and that the identified employees (witnesses) were contacted by us and had no concerns re
being interviewed by the Army. SSAJ jreviewed the 302s he has in his possession and advises
he sees no reason why Army CID should not access them.
If, however, you have documentation that asserts our Agents abused prisoners, then they are not
"witnesses" - and we need to take the lead in the investigation and not make them available to Army
CID. I'm concerned with one of your sentences which indicates there is correspondence that our Agents
were accused of the abuse - if you have a letter like that, we need to see it immediately.
Thanks in advance for your response.
Toni FogleI . I ~,
-----Original Message-----
From: I ~crD) (FBI)
Sent: Thursday, July 221 20048:37' AM
To: FOGLE1 TONI M. (INSD) (FBI)
Cc: HARRINGTON, T J. (0"0) (FBI)
11/912004 FBI001949CBT ACLU-RDI p.1
DOJOIG 001722
Message Page 2 0[2
Subject: CPR
UNCLASSIFIED
NON·RECORD
Toni: 1
1
m the ASC of ITOS-2. We are responsible for among everything, Iraq. DAD TJ Harrington
advised last month that US Army CID had sent a letter in stating that two of our agents in Baghdad
were being accused of prisoner abuse. At roughly the same time we received info that the military
in Baghdad was being accused of abusing a prisoner that our agentp had intAOti;::d :nd tIat they,
the military, wanted access to o~r documents regarding the prisoner ~__ _ __ The b6
3025 we have indicate that SAsL Iand In ervrewe this b 7 C
particular prisoner. Are these the same agents being accused of abusing a prisoner? If so, should
we be giving the military our 302s from the interview? Please advise~ I
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
11/9/2004 FBI001950CBT ACLU-RDI p.2
DOJOIG 001723