A chain of emails discussing the possible investigation by a Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) investigator of a FBI agent who had been present in Afghanistan when a prisoner died. The agent filled out an action report upon return, and responded to the NCIS's written list of questions which had to do with the death in question. The investigator did not give him any information as to whether or not he was a target.
Message
FOGLE, TONI M. (INSD) (FBI)
From: I.(INSD) (FBI)
Sent: Wednesday, september 29, 20042:38 PM
To: FOGLE, TONI M. (INSD) (FBI)
Subject: RE:
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
NON·RECORD
Page 1 of2
AL L INFOPRATION O~rrA NE
HE IN I S ~JC S S I FI
DATE 03- 13 -2009 BY 65179 DI1H/1s c
b 6
b 7C
This was the case, but Steve is a little off on a couple of things. I am the guy that voiced concerns over the
potential failure to report issue.
~~ .....J
b 6
b 7C
-----Original Message-----
From: FOGLE, TONI M. (INSO) (FBI)
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 F2::.:;;1.;;.6.;.,P.:..;M~ __----. Tol I(INSD) (FBI)J ICINSO) (FBI);I I(INSO) (FBI)
Subject: FW:
. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
NON-RECORD
Is this what you were talking about this morning? We need to talk as soon as I get through the next 100
email. T>
-----Original Message-----
From: GRANT, ROBERT O. (INSD) (FBI)
Sent: Wednesday, September 29,20041:40 PM
To: FOGLE, TONI M. (INSO) (FBI)
Cc: MERSHON, MARK J. (SF)(FBI)
Subject: FW:
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
NON-RECORD
Toni: Take a look at SAC Tidwell's question below and let us know how we should be responding to him.
thanks
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: TIDWELL,J STEPHEN (IR) (FBI)
Sent: Wednesday, September 29,200411:03 AM
To: ASHLEY, GRANT O. (00) (FBI); PISTOLE, JOHN S. (00) (FBI); Caproni, Valerie E. (OGe) (FBI); BALD,
GARY M. (CTO) (FBI) .
Cc: GRANT, ROB~P.T O. (INSO) (FBI)~ tHRT) (FBI); I ~ASO)
(FBI)
Subject:
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
NON-RECORO
b6
b7C
b 6
b7C
11/9/2004 FBI001848CBT ACLU-RDI p.1
DOJOIG 001621
Message Page 2 of2
Forinfoof all:
You can seethe protocol belo~ for reportjrg in the Afghanistan and then oscl Irecollection.
Here's the background from S'1 he was with the SF forces that captured th£f SUbject iQ
question. After a raid, theSUbject was taken away for interrogationand as always, SAl Jalong
withthe restof the shooyers (SFto which he is attached) departed to return to their base of operations.
c::::::::Jwas not presentor in the vicinity ofthe interrogationthat evidently led to the death of the subject. b 6
Hewrotehis after action. Some time later, NCIS came to him with a written list of questions, in retrosapect b7C
he nowrealizes hadto do with the death in question, which he responded to. He has already been
lntervlewed b~ N~ISi The NelS investigatorthis time would no' give him any info or say whetherhe is a
targetor not. spoke withthe Agent's Association attorneyand based on that conversation and the
facts above, e pans to talkwith NCIS, today.
I needto knowfrom wherethe concerns came from that have been vooiced he might have a failureto
reportproblem and mightbe in troublewith us.
Steve .
-----Original Message-----
From: BAMFORD, WARREN T. (IR) (FBI)
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 .-'2.;...:0_2....;.P...;.M ....:,. b 6
To: TIDWELL, J STEPHEN (IR) (FBI);I "[HRT) (FBI);I'-- I(HRT) b7C
(FBI) .
Subject: RE: NelS interview requestof s~ _
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
NON-RECORD
All'agents in Afghanistan who participatein SSEs are requiredto complete an after action report
(MR) uponreturn. Within thisMR, they note times of d~arturi and return, information or items
recovered, and any pertinent or noteworthyactivity. I thin twE SSE, while I was there and he was
out on a third and had notreturned when I left. On one of the SSEs, was asked by the military to
provide answers to a set of questions that I believe are relatedto the incident in question but I'm not sure
without knowing additional details. So, in addition to the MR, there may also be a second document
describing his actionsandwhat he saw.
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
v-
b 6
b7C
11/912004
DOJOIG 001622
FBI001849CBT ACLU-RDI p.2