DOS Memo re: Talking Points on Guantanamo Detainees Treatment and Status

Error message

  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::current() should either be compatible with Iterator::current(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::next() should either be compatible with Iterator::next(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::key() should either be compatible with Iterator::key(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::valid() should either be compatible with Iterator::valid(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::rewind() should either be compatible with Iterator::rewind(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).

State Department talking points memo on the treatment of detainees in Guantanamo and difference between POWs and illegal combatants. The memo presents the question: What are the legal differences between POWs and illegal combatants? And answers it with an analysis of the Geneva Convention's definition of both.

Doc_type: 
Non-legal Memo
Doc_date: 
Monday, January 28, 2002
Doc_rel_date: 
Wednesday, December 29, 2004
Doc_text: 

UNCLASSIFIED RELEASED IN FULL
L Press Guidance January 28, 2002
TREATMENT OF DETAINEES IN GUANTANAMO
Q: Is there daylight between the State Department and the Administration on the classification of the detainees — POWs or illegal combatants? What are the legal differences between the two? How does the Geneva Convention apply to both POWs and illegal combatants?
-THE LEGAL STATUS OF DETAINEES IS CURRENTLY BEING REVIEWED WITHIN THE ADMINISTRATION.
-- WHATEVER THE LEGAL STATUS OF DETAINEES, THE INDIVIDUALS BEING DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO ARE BEING TREATED HUMANELY CONSISTENT WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
UNCLASSIFIED
REVIEW AUTHORITY: ARCHIE M BOLSTER
DOS-001057
DATE/CASE ID: 14 DEC 2004 200303827
1.•
UNCLASSIFIED
For Background Only:
Reports over the weekend distinguished between prisoners of war (POWs) and "unlawful combatants" under the Geneva Conventions. POWs are those persons who fall within one of several defined categories of armed forces, provided for in the Third Geneva Convention on the protection of POWs. All such categories presume that armed forces meet one of several requirements designed to ensure that combatants distinguish themselves from the civilian population and enemy soldiers (e.g., distinctive insignia/uniform and carrying arms openly) and adhere to the law of war. A detainee who belongs to an armed force that fails to meet such requirements would not be entitled to'POW status. For instance, al Qaeda detainees have no entitlement to POW status precisely because, inter alis, their organization is designed to violate the law of war by targeting civilians.
The Geneva Conventions do not explicitly provide for a category of combatants who do not meet the POW requirements; customary international law refers to such persons as unlawful combatants -- persons not entitled to engage in hostilities as regular soldiers can. Such persons are entitled to the basic humane treatment protections of the Third Geneva Convention (under what is called "Common Article 3"), but they are not entitled to POW status and the various benefits accorded to POWs.
Importantly, the status question will not affect treatment of persons detained at GTMO, since all detainees are being treated consistent with the principles of the Third Geneva Convention, taking into account the temporary nature of facilities and the severe security environment.
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS-001058
UNCLASSIFIED

Drafted:.L/PM - DKaye x75613.Doc 99968.1/28/02
Cleared:.L: Frhessin ok L/OES - EBloom ok S/WCI - MNewton ok PA - NBeck
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS-001059

Doc_nid: 
6150
Doc_type_num: 
63