Combatant Status Review Tribunal Panel #7 Decision Report re: Classification of Detainee as an Enemy Combatant

Error message

  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::current() should either be compatible with Iterator::current(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::next() should either be compatible with Iterator::next(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::key() should either be compatible with Iterator::key(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::valid() should either be compatible with Iterator::valid(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::rewind() should either be compatible with Iterator::rewind(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).

<p>Tribunal determined that the detainee in question has been accurately classified as an "Enemy Combatant" and that he willingly joined the Taliban and fought against American armed forces. The detainee denied all allegations against him, stating that he had never been to Afghanistan and that any admissions he made in Guantanamo Bay were the result of torture and threats.</p>

Doc_type: 
Legal Memo
Doc_date: 
Thursday, October 7, 2004
Doc_rel_date: 
Tuesday, November 29, 2005
Doc_text: 

UNCLASSIFTED//FOU0 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY OF BASIS FOR TRIBUNAL DECISION (Enclosure (1) to Combatant Status Review Tribunal Decision Report) TRIBLNAA .#7 ISN #: 1. Introduction As the Combatant Status Review Tribunal (CSRT) Decision Report indicates, the Tribunal has determined that this detainee is properly classified as an enemy combatant and was part of or supporting Taliban or Al Qaida forces. In reaching its conclusions, the Tribunal considered both classified and unclassified information The following is an ­ account of the unclassified evidence considered by the Tribunal and other pertinent information. Classified evidence considered by the Tribunal is discussed in Enclosure (2) to the CSRT Decision Report 2. Synopsis of Proceedings The Tribunal bearing was held on 7 October 2004. The Recorder presented Exhibits R-1 and R-2 during the unclassified portion of the Tribtmal. Exhibit R-1 is the Unclassified Summary of Evidence. It indicates, among other things, that the detainee voluntarily joined the Taliban; that the detainee received training on various weapons; that the detainee was assigned an AK-47 and a 7.62mm PIC.; that the detainee agreed to fight with the Taliban; that the detainee received money from Usama Bin Laden; that the detainee's name was recovered on a list of probable Al Qaida operativer, that the detainee fought against coalition forces for approximately nine months, firing his weapon at coalition forces; that the detainee manned an ami-aircraft gun during combat; and that the detainee was present at Tore Bora during the U.S. air campaign. Exhibit R-2 is the FBI request for redaction of National Security Information dated 22 September 2004. The Recorder called no witnesses. The detainee participated actively in the Tribunal process and made an unsworn verbal statement for the Tribunal's consideration. In sum, the detainee denied all of the allegations against him and asserted that he has never been to Afghanistan. Furthermore,the detainee states that any .prior statements he has made admitting to the allegations were the result of torture or threats that he would never leave Cuba. The detainee's testimony, including his responsei to the questions posed to him, is summarized in Enclosure (3) to the CSRT Decision Report. The detainee called no witnesses. During the classified session of the Tribunal, the Recorder presented Exhibits R-3 through R-17. The Recorder offered no comments on the classified evidence. The Personal Representative had nothing additional to offer and made no comments. The UNCLASSIFIED//FOU0 .I1SN Enclosurellb Page 1 of3 30402 NOV00100 DODDON-000502 UNCLASSIFIED/SOU° Tribunal considered both the unclassified and classified exhibits, as well as the detainee's unsworn testimony in reaching its decision. 3. Evidence Considered by the Tribunal The Tribunal considered the following evidence in reaching its conclusions: a. Exhibits: D-A and R-1 through R-17. b. Testimony of the following persons: None. c. Unsworn statement of the detainee: See Enclosure (3) to the CSRT Decision Report 4. Rulings by the Tribunal on Detainee Requests for Evidence or Witnesses The Detainee requested no witnesses. The Detainee requested no additional evidence be produced. S. Discussion of Unclassified Evidence The Tribunal considered the following unclassified evidence in making its determinations: - a. The Recorder offered Exhibits R-1 and R-2 into evidence during the unclassified portion of the proceeding. Exhibit R-1 is the Unclassified Summary of Evidence. While this summary is helpful in that it provides a broad outline of what the Triburud can expect to see, it is not persuasive in that it provides conclusory statements without supporting unclassified evidence. Exhibit R-2 provided no usable evidence. Accordingly, the Tribunal bad to look to other exhibits for support of the Unclassified Summary of Evidence. b. The detainee made an unsworn statement at the Tribunal. Afterwards, he answered questions posed by the Tribunal members. In sum, the detainee testified that all the allegations against him Were false. He stated that many of his statements to interrogators that he has nude in the past were not true and were the result of torture. He further stated that interrogators told him unless he admitted to the allegations against him he would never leave Cuba. The detainee's =swam testimony is summarized inEnclosure (3) to the CSRT Decision Report. When considered in conjunction with theclassified evidence, the Tribunal found the detainee's testimony unpersuasive. As noted above, the Tribunal also relied on classified evidence in reaching its decision, and found the classified evidence persuasive in establishing that the detainee is properly UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO • ISNnit Paclosure 0) Page2of3 30403 NOV00101 MN, DODDON-000503 UNCLASSIFIED/SOU° classified as an enemy combatant. A discussion of the classified evidence is found in Enclosure (2) to the Combatant Status Review Tribunal Decision Report. .• 6. Consultations with the CSRT Legal Advisor The Tribunal consulted the CSRT Assistant Legal Advisor regarding allegations of torture raised by the detainee during his unsworn testimony. As per instructions, the OARDEC Forward Chief Of Staff, and the OARDEC Liaison to the Criminal Investigation Task Force and JTF-GTMO were notified of the matters on 7 October 2004. 7. COICIIIAMLI of the Tribunal Upon careful review of all the evidence presented in this matter, the Tribunal makes the following determinations: a. The detainee was mentally and physically capable of participating in the proceeding. No medical or menial health evaluation was deemed necessary. b. The detainee understood the Tribunal proceedings and actively participated throughout c. The detainee is properly classified as an enemy combatant and was part of or supporting Taliban or Al Qaida forces. & Dissenting Tribunal Member's report None. The Tribunal reached a unanimous decision. Respectfully submitted, Colonel, U.S. Army Tribunal President UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO ISN Enclosure (1) Page 3 of 3 30404 NOV00102 DODDON-000504

Doc_nid: 
2863
Doc_type_num: 
62