N/A
C06541511 ..,...,,,.. .......... ;... ' ,,p ..
Approved for Release: 2016/06/1 O C06541511
.I.---" ,).
MEMORANDUM FOR:
FROM:
OFFICE:
SUBJECT: (b)(3) CIAAct
REFERENCE(b )(6)
(b)(1)
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b )(3) NatSecAct
(b )(6)
[(b)(3) CIAActl .
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b (3) NatSecAct
22 January 2003
CONCERNS OVER REVISED INTERROGATION PLAN FOR NASHIRI
0Below is e cable that I drafted which I don't exnect to ao
anvwhere but I want it entered for the recorrl. I
(b)(5)
(b )(6)
Ori inator Previous Reviewer{s} Future Reviewer{s)
(b)(3) CIAAct ~ (~)~~1;rent Rev[e~
._ ___ ___, (b)(3) CIAAct_j .
(b )(3) NatSecAct
I (b)(1) J
(b )(6) (b)(3) CIAAct
, • .'
·'
S 15 e it E I
(b )(6)
STAFF
. TO: IMMEDIATE (b)(1)
(b)(3) NatSecAct
8ECAET//X1
Approved for Release: 2016/06/10 C06541511
(b )(3) NatSecAct
(b )(6)
C06541511 ....... lllil
Approved for Release: 2016/06/1 o C06541511
~. FROM: (b)(1)
~------------(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) Na!SecAct
SUBJECT: CONCERNS OVER REVISED INTERROGATION ?LAN FOR NASHIRI
REF:
(b)(1)---, _____ .
(b)(3) NatSecAct
TEXT:
1 • ACTION REQUIRED: NONE, FYI •
2. APPRECIATE REF DETAILED INTERROGATION PLAN FOR NASHIRI,
HOWEVER, WE HAVE SERIOUS RESERVATIONS WITH THE CONTINUED USE OF
ENHANCED TECHNIQUES WITH NASHIRI (SUBJECT) AND ITS LONG TERM
IMPACT ON HIM. SUBJECT HAS BEEN HELD FOR THREE MONTHS IN VERY
DIFFICULT CONDITIONS, BOTH PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY. IT IS THE
ASSESSMENT OF PRIOR INTERROGATORS THAT NASHIRI HAS BEEN MAINLY
TRUTHFUL AND IS NOT WITHHOLDING SIGNIFI.CANT INFORMATION. TO
(b)(1) CONTINUE TO USE ENHANCED TECHNIQUE WITHOUT CLEAR INDICATIONS THAT
INFO IS EXCESSIVE AND MAY CAUSE HIM TO
LEVEL. SUBJECT MAY COME TO THE
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) Na!SecA';f WITHHOLDING IMPORTANT
b)(6) CEASE COOPERATION ON ANY
CONCLUSION THAT WHETHER HE COOPERATES OR NOT, HE WILL CONTINUALLY
BE SUBJECTED TO ENHANCED TECHNIQUES, THEREFORE, WHAT IS THE
(b)(1)
b)(3) Na!SecAci•CENTIVE FOR CONTINUED COOPERATION. ALSO, BOTH C/CTC/RG AND HVT
INTERROGATOR WHO DEPARTED IN c:::JrANUARY, BELIEVE
~-~ ~--~
CONTINUED ENHANCED METHODS MAY PUSH SUBJECT OVER THE EDGE
b)(3) Na!SecActycHOLOGICALLY.
) •
3, ANOTHER AREA OF CONCERN IS THE USE OF THE PSYCHOLOGIST
AS AN INT.ERROGATOR. THE ROLE OF THE OPS PSYCHOLOGIST IS TO BE A
DETACHED OBSERVER AND SERVE AS A CHECK ON THE.INTERROGATOR TO
PREVENT.THE INTERROGATOR FROM ANY UNINTENTIONAL EXCESS OF
SECRE'f//X 1
i
'-------------------------------·---·-·-
Approved for Release: 2016/06/10 C06541511
C06541511
I,-.,
1--~.
Approved for Rel~~;;:-2oi'6)o6/1 o C06541511
PRESSURE WHICH MIGHT CAUSE PERMANENT PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM.TO THE
SUBJECT. THE MEDICAL OFFICER IS ON HAND TO PROVIDE THE SAME
(b)(1)
(b)(3) CIAAct PROTECTION !!'ROM PHYSICAL ACTIONS THA,T MIGHT HARM THE SUBJECT.
(b)(3) NatSecActl'iEREFORE, THE MEDICAL OFFICER AND THE PSYCHOLOGIST SHOULD NOT
' (b )(6) SERVE AS AN INTERROGATOR; WHICH IS A CONFLICT .OF RESPONSIBILITY.
WE NOTE THAT REF CONTAINS A PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERROGATION
ASSESSMENT BY [(b)(3) CIAAct=-1 PSYCHOLOGIST WHICH IS TO BE
CARRIED OUT BY INTERROGATOR WE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH HIM
(b)(1)
(b)(3) CIAAct CONDUCTING BOTH ROLES SIMULTANEOUS_L_Y_·~----------------,
(b)(3) NatSecAct (b)(5)
(b )(6)
I
-'---(b)(1 )_. -----..------------------'I
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
(b )(6)
CC:
Sent on 22 January 2003 at 11:25:11 AM
SEERETh'3C 1
'-----------.......... "
Approved for Release: 2016/06/1 O C06541511