Army Memo re: Information Paper Concerning Allegations of Maltreatment of Enemy Prisoners of War

Error message

  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::current() should either be compatible with Iterator::current(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::next() should either be compatible with Iterator::next(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::key() should either be compatible with Iterator::key(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::valid() should either be compatible with Iterator::valid(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DBObject::rewind() should either be compatible with Iterator::rewind(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 7 of /usr/home/documentafterliv/public_html/sites/all/modules/contrib/eck/eck.classes.inc).

Discusses the Article 32 investigation into four military policemen charged with abuse. Abuse counts involve seven (7) EPWs. Abuse includes kicking, striking, dragging, punching and twisting detainees arm. All names redacted. Details the specific charges against each one.

Doc_type: 
Non-legal Memo
Doc_date: 
Monday, September 15, 2003
Doc_rel_date: 
Sunday, May 15, 2005
Doc_text: 

Information Paper
15 Sep 2003
SUBJECT: ILIOSoldiers and Allegations of Maltreatment of EPWs
-
POINTS: 0A-%Es/NY-(io s
• On 13 July 2003, charge re pre rredy ains our milita policemen assigned to the: titgMt :onnectio ith th: 2
43V y 2003 alleged (treatment of seven
(7) Iraqi en y risoners o ar (EP s) a amp Bucca, Iraq. e charged soldie itkivAffill11111
) were part of a detail assigned to a
transport prisoners from Talil Air Base raq, to Camp Bucca. All are assigned to an MP battalion that is part of the 8 .USAR.
9
:A. t#: and the Special Court-Martial Convening Authority (SPCMCA), directed a joint Article 32 Investigation and appointed a senior military police officer, a LTC, to conduct it.

AUtp:Olit commander of thaiNgIVII


The Article 32 investigation, open to the public, began on 27 August at Camp Bucca, Iraq, with all four accused and their counsel present. The investigating officer heard extensive testimony from both US military witnesses and EPW's. The Article 32 was recessed late in the evening of 29 July and reconvened at Camp Doha, Kuwait, the afternoon of 1 September to hear certain telephonic testimony, as well as the testimony of witnesses returning to Kuwait on Sunday, 31 August.


The Article 32 Investigating Officer (10) closed the hearing on 2 September 2003. The IO ordered a verbatim transcript of the entire proceedings, and the U

#10s,TA is currently transcribing the record requested. Once the transcript is completed, the I0 will make his findings and recommendations, and it will be forwarded to the Special Court-Martial Convening Authority for review and action as appropriate.


The preferral of charges against the four accused soldiers was made only after careful review of the criminal investigation. All appropriate actions have been taken to ensure the rights of the accused soldiers are safeguarded and that the alleged misconduct is investigated and processed IAW the UCMJ. It is improper and unlawful command influence for senior commanders or HQDA officials to interfere with the case.


The accompanying enclosure gives more details about the alleged misconduct and the alleged injuries suffered by the detained EPWs.

Prepared by:
Approved by: BG Wright

8090
DOD 006748

ENCLOSURE
• The collective Charge Sheets reflect allegations of abuse concerning seven (7)
.
separate Iraqi EPWs: (61,0 -. s-
:=)111111111111111 Mg.nd g:.are acc.of kicking and strikin the EP.the groin, face, abdomen and head. -,a,_ and ger.are accused of holding the EPW down, with his legs spreadC- - 4.
apart, encouraging the beating.. (610 -s7(6)elycys-
, - ISM.and KW agging the EPW across the ground by his armpits. ~4 lso allegedly kicked and punched the EPW.
((:)\6)-SALY-/Ye.
is accused of thr i ing the EPW to the ground and striking him on the head and legs. AUG--allegedly kicked the EPW in the face and leg.
6
-
0(6)- SAI-ITC)
o 111111111.1111 is accused of throwing the EPW to the ground and stepped on his injured arm.

43A-s-/
ands.re accused of *-.9\c-.twisting the EPW's previously injured arm. .
5
at). )­
o is accused of knocking the EPW to the ground, then dragging him across the ground with his (the EPW's) pants around his ankles. .
Nic-)-c/gAc)-
o Unknown Iraqi EPW.•.is accused of kicking an unknown EPW in the thigh as he walked toward an in-processing tent, causing him to cry out in pain.
• The soldiers have been charged as follows:

FL-11C
o In connection with the 12 May 2003 incidents, ,, t..arge.th Assault (3 specifications); Cruelty and Maltreatment (3 spe 'cation Failure to an Obey Order or Regulation (2 specifications- 9 erelictio duty to safeguard the prisoners, and negligent supery on of other who allegedly participated in the assaults). On 16 ay 2003, allegedly gave a sworn statement to CID, in whi she denied any participation in, or knowledge of, the assaul she is charged wit Making a False Official Statement. Also,.s charged with att • mpting to impede the investigation (a violation of the eneral Article), in t at she allegedly instructed a subordinate (who was also a potential wit • ss and/or subject of the investigation) not to submit to a polygraph. AU alleged to have told the subordinate, with a wink, that he "didn't see anything."
8091
2
DOD 006749

040s(­
-
iw
o In connection with the 12 May 2003 incidents, 8 A111.11 is charged with Assault (5 specifications); Cruelty and Maltreatment (5 specifications); and Failure to Obey an Order or Regulation (dereliction of his duty to safeguard the prisoners). On 16 May 2003, #61111111111gave a sworn statement to CID, in which he denied any participation in, or knowledge of, the assaults; he is charged with Making a False Official Statement.

o In connection with the 12 May 2003 incidents, . s charged with Assault; Cruelty and Maltreatment; and Failure to an Obey Order or Regulation (dereliction of her duty to safeguard the prisoner).

o In connection with the 12 May 2003 incidents, in is charged with Assault (4 specifications); Cruelty and Maltreatment (4 specifications); and Failure to Obey an Order or Regulation dereliction of his duty to safeguard the prisoners). On 15 May 2003,.gave a sworn statement to CID, in which he denied any participation in, or knowledge of, the assaults; he is charged with Making a False Official Statement.

8092
3
DOD 006750

Doc_nid: 
3402
Doc_type_num: 
63