AR 15-6 Investigation re: Legal Review of AR 15-6 into Death of Iraqi Detainee Ziad Muhammed Tariq

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS ARMORED DIVISION BAGHDAD, IRAQ
AETV-THH 06 Sep 2003
MEMORANDUM FOR BG Martin E. Dempsey, Commander, 1 m Armored Division
SUBJECT: Legal Review of AR 15-6 into Death of Ziad Muhammed Tariq, Iraqi Detainee
1.
On 29 August 2003, you initiated an informal investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of Mr. Ziad Muhammed Tariq, an Iraqi detainee, on 22 August 2003. The investigating officer (10) completed the investigation on 03 September 2003.

2.
I have reviewed the investigation in accordance with AR 15-6, paragraph 2-3b and make thefollowing determinations:

a.
The investigation substantially complies with legal requirements.

b.

There are no procedural errors or irregularities that invalidate the investigation.
c.
Sufficient evidence supports the 10's findings.

d.
The 10's findings are consistent with his recommendations.

3.
In accordance with AR 15-6, paragraph 2-3, the appointing authority is neither bound nor
limited by the 10's findings or recommendations.

4.
The point of contact for this memorandum is the undersigned at DNVT 551 -1111 orsimingus.army.smil.mil .

CPT, JA Reviewing Attorney

REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS BY INVESTIGATING OFFICER/BOARD OF OFFICERS
For use of this form, see AR 15.6; the proponent agency is OTJAG.
IF MORE SPACE IS REQUIRED IN FILLING OUT ANY PORTION OF THIS FORM, ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS
SECTION I - APPOINTMENT
Appointed by BG Martin E. Dempsey

(Appointing authority)
on 29 AUG 03
(Date)

(Attach enclosure 1: Letter of appointment or summary of oral appointment data.) (See porn 3-15. AR 15-6.)
SECTION II • SESSIONS
(investigation) 41~69- commenced at
The Ba ,hdad International Air srt
at
1600
(Place)
on 29 AUG 03
(Time)Were) (If a formal board met for more than one session, check here
El .
ended, the place, persons present and absent, and explanation of absences, if any.) Indicate in an enclosure the time each session began and
present: The following persons
(members, respondents, counsel) were(After each name, indicate capacity, e.g., President, Recorder, Member, Legal Advisor.)
The following persons
(members, respondents, counsel)
were absent:
(htclude brief explanation of each absence.) (See paras 5-2 and 5-8a, AR 13-6.)
The (investigating officer) Alamml$,
finished gathering/hearing evidence at
1800
on 02 SEP 03
(Time)
and completed findings and
recommendations at (Date)
1400

(Ml 03 SEP 03
(Time) (Date)
SECTION III - CHECKLIST FOR PROCEEDINGS
A. COMPLETE IN ALL CASES
Indosures
(para 3-15. AR 15-6)
N/
Are the following inclosed and numbered consecutively with Roman numerals:I a. The letter of aprxiiiitmeni or a summary of oral (Attached in order listed)
appointment data"'
I b
Copy of nonce to respondent, if any?
(See Item 9, below)
c.
Other correspondence
with respondent or counsel, if any?
d.
All other written communications to or from the appointing authority?
e. Privacy Act
Statements
(Certificate, if statement provided orally)?
.1. Explanation by the
investigating officer or board of any unusual delays, difficulties, irregularities, or other problems
encountered
(e.R., absence of material witnesses)?
R. Information as to sessions '
X
of a formal hoard not included on page
h I of this report?
Any other significam papers
(other than evidence)
relating
)TNOTES. to administrative aspects of the investigation or board?
Ernium tilt nego:ive unswers on an u::ached slue;.
or noun!. did rue occur in :his limes:4,16"n :he N/4 column corimi:icet n poskive represen:igion :kr :he IC/ruins:um:es clescrihed in :he glieleion
FORM 1574, MAR 83
Frii -rinto

DOD FINAL 103
DOD 57690

Exhibits
(porn 3-16, AR 15-6)
: Are all items offered
(whether or nor received)
YES IN
or considered as evidence individually numbered or lettered as
exhibits and attached to this report?
b.
Is an index of all exhibits offered to or considered by investigating officer or board attached before the first exhibit?
c Has the testimony/statement of each witness been recorded verbatim or been reduced to written form and attached as
an exhibit?
d.
Are copies, descriptions, or depicticnis
of substituted for real or documentary evidence)
the location of the original evidence indicated? properly authenticated and is
e. Are descriptions or diagrams included of locations visited by the investigating officer or board IX'
f Is each written sti ulatio (parer 3-66, AR 15-61?
pn attached as an exhibit and is each oral stipulation either reduced to writing and made an

exhibit or recorded in a verbatim record?
g.
If official notice of any matter was taken over the objection of a respondent or counsel, is a statement of the matter
of which official notice was taken attached as an exhibit

(para 3-16d, AR 15-6)?
3 Was a quorum present when the board voted on findings and recommendations
(pares 4-1 and 5-2b, AR 15-6)?
B.
COMPLETE ONLY FOR FORMAL BOARD PROCEEDINGS
(Chapter 5, AR 156)
-
At the initial session, did the recorder read, or determine that all participants had read, the letter of appointment
Was a quorum present at every session of the hoard (paro 5-3b, AR 15-6)?

(para 5-26, AR 15-6)?
Was each absence of any member properly excused
(porn 5-2a. AR 15-6)?
Were
members, witnesses, reporter, and interpreter sworn, if required
(porn 3-1, AR 15-61?
If any members who voted on findings or reconunendations were not present when the board received some evidence,
does the inclosure describe how they familiarized themselves with that evidence

(porn 5-2d, AR 15-6)?
C.
COMPLETE ONLY IF RESPONDENT WAS DESIGNATED
(Section II, Chapter 5, AR 15
Notice to respondents -6)
(porn 5-5, AR 15-6):
a.
Is the method and date
of delivery to the respondent indicated cm each letter of notification?

b.

Was the date of delivery at least five working days prior to the first session of the board?

c.

Does each letter of notification indicate —
(I)

the date, hour. and place of the first session of the board concerning that respondent?

(2)

the matter to be investigated including specific allegations against the respondent, if any?

(3)

the respondent's rights with regard to counsel?
(4)

the name and address of each witness expected to be called by the recorder?
(5)

the respondent's rights to be present, present evidence, and call witnesses?
d.
Was the respondent provided a copy of all. unclassified documents in the case
e. file?
If there were relevant classified materials, were the respondent and his
counsel given access and an opportunity to examine them?

10 If any respondent was designated after the proceedings began
a. (or otherwise was absent during part of the proceedings):
Was lie properly notified
(porn 5-5. AR 15-6)?
b.
Was record of proceedings and evidence:rweived in his absence made available for examination by him

Counsel
(porn 5-6, AR 15-6): and his counsel (pun, 5-4c. AR 15
-6)1
Name and husiness address of counsel:
(If counsel is a lawyer, check here
Was respondent's counsel present at all open sessions of the board relating to that respondent'?
c If military counsel was requested but not made available, is a copy
action taken on it included in the report (or, if oral, a summary) of the request and the

(para 5-6b, AR 15-61?
If the respondent challenged the legal advisor or any voting member for lack of impartiality
a (para 5-7, AR 15-61:
Was the challenge properly denied and by the approPriate
officer?
b.
Did each member successfully challenged cease to participate in the proceedings?
Was the respondent given an opportunity to

(para 5-8a, AR 15-6)
n
Be present with his counsel at all open sessions of the board which
b. deal with any matter which concerns that respondent?
Examine and object to the introduction
of real and documentary evidence, including written statements?

Object to the
testimony of wtmesses and cross-examine witnesses other than his own?

J.
Call witnesses and
otherwise introduce evidence?
e. Testify as a witness?
f
Make or have his counsel make a final statement or argument
(para 5-9, AR 15-6)?
If requested, did the recorder assist the respondent in obtaining evidence in possession of the Government and in
arranging for the presence of witnesses
warn 5-86, AR 15-61?
Are all of the respondent's requests and objections which were denied indicated in the report of proceedings
inclosure or exhibit to it
(porn 5-11, AR I5-6)? or in an
)TNOTES: ii Etplum all neganIr anvwers nn un uz:uched
11.1e erl:he N/A ,rdiann
ur /round u pascrl.e repretervaian Mu; :be vervain's:am

, VA
described in :he queizirm did nu: accur in :his inrevigu:iim2 1'4 pages, DA Form 1574, Mar 83
USAPA VI.;

DOD FINAL 104
DOD 57691

SECTION IV -FINDINGS (para 3-10, AR 15-6)
The
(investigating officer) Afamdigisk having carefully considered the evidence, finds: See Attached Memoradum
SECTION V -RECOMMENDATIONS (para 3-11, AR 15-6)
In view of the above findings, the
(investigating officer) Oarrivay recommends:
See Attached Memorandum
Page 3 of 4 pages. DA Farm 1574, Mar 83
USAP,
SECTION VI - AUTHENTICATION Own 3 -17, AR 15-6)
THIS REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS IS COMPLETE AND ACCURATE. (If any voting member or the recorder fails to sign here .or in Section below, indicate the reason in the space where his signature should appear.)
(Recorder) (Investigating Officer)4Agesidry
(Member) (Member)
(Member) (Member)
SECTION VII - MINORITY REPORT (para 3-13, AR 15-6)
To the extent indicated in inclosure , the undersigned do(es) not concur in the findings and recommendations of the board.
(In the inclosure, identify by number each finding and/or recommendation in which the dissenting member(s) do(es) not concur. State thereasons for disagreement. Additional/substitute findings and/or recommendations may be included in the inclosure.)
(Member) (Member)
SECTION VIII - ACTION BY APPOINTING AUTHORITY (para 2-3, AR 15-6)
The findings and recommendations of the 1--Cltestillaz ting office0 (board) are approve (disapproved) (approved with following exceptions/
substitutions). (If the appointing authority returns t e proceangs to the invesug ting officer or board for further proceedings or
corrective action, attach that correspondence (or a summary, if oral) as a numbered inclosure.)

..--.-7.
,
sc, (AsA
cz=7:44,14,40/o/pJ
Page 4 of 4 pages. DA Form 1574. Mar 83 USA PA
DOD FINAL 106

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
HEADQUARTERS, 1" ARMORED DIVISION ARTILLERY
Unit 92851
APO AE 09324-2851

Ifl I'l I In
All f111111.1 fli

AETV-THT-XO 03 SEP 03
MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, 1 st Armored Division
SUBJECT: Results of AR 15-6 Investigation on Death of Iraqi National Detainee
1. Summary of Facts.
At 221600 AUG 03, SGT conducted a changeover
inspection of the 1-13 AR (Dakota) Detention Facility and assumed duties as the Commander of the elief (COR). His uard d tail consisted of three additional personnel: PFC
PV2 and PFC
During his insection he
pcount /checked each detainee and inventoried the evidence room. During his check, SGT
stated he observed Tariq, Zaid Muhammed (Iraqi Detainee) lying on the floor on
his
back fanning himself with an MRE box. He also stated Tariq looked up at him and waved.At that time, SGT MI saw no reason to suspect Tariq was becoming a heat casualty or suffering from any medical emergency. Approximately 221700 AUG 03, SGT
PFC and
departed the detention facility to pick up Class I for the detail. During this time,
PV2
and PFC
the latrine, and take a bath. PV2started letting the detainees out of their cells t get water, use opened the cells while PFC
providedsecurity from the end of the hall. During this process PV2 found Tariq
uncontrollably kicking and rolling around on the floor. He opened the door and had two o
detainees carry Tariq to the courtr i
" ar
l. They began to our an rub water on Tariq in an they
attempt to cool him dawn. PV2 directed PFC
to call the Battalion Aid
Station (Dakota Bandaid and with' five minutes the medics were on site. The medics, led
by SGT
diagnosed the situation and determined Tariq was not
sweating an had a shortness of breath. They immediately attempted to administer an IV to
Tariq, but could not find a vein suitable enough to get the needle in. After a few attempts,
they decided to transport Tariq to the Battalion Aid Station for further treatment.
A ro imately 221750 AUG 03 the medics arrived at the aid station and CPT (MD)

and CPT (PA)
assessed Tariq as uiiiiinsive, weak shallow
Frro
eaths, weak rapid pulse, and pupils fixed and dilated. CPT diagnosed Tariq as a
possible heat stoke victim. They attempted to administer an IV and could not find a vein.
After a few attempts, they decided to give

the IV rectally. At the same time they intubated
Tariq and placed him on 100 % oxygen. Tariq's axillary temperature was 102 degrees so they
removed his clothes and attempted to cool him down with fans and water. Approximately
221815 AUG 03, the aid station transported Tariq to the Kadamiya University Hos ital for
further treatment. Enroute to the hospital Tariq went into cardiac arrest and CPT
began administering CPR. Upon arriving to the hospital, Tariq had no heartbeat, no pulse,

and
was not breathing. He was pronounced dead and laced ' hospital morgue.
Approximately 231700 AUG 03, Special Agent
Air witnessed the autos of
provided an Agent's Investigation Report. SA
oed
bsery y. Dr.
from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology conduct the aut
ops
There were no
AETV-THT-XO
SUBJECT Results of AR 15-6 Investigation
apparent signs of trauma, bruising, cuts, or ligature marks. After the full autopsy, Dr. stated the death was a natural death, with no indications of physical abuse, and consistent with
a heat stroke. SA
stated the final autopsy results could take up to three months to be completed. Based on the preliminary autopsy results he determined there was no criminal intention or misconduct and closed the CID investigation.
2. Findings,
a. Standing Operating Procedures at the Detention Facility.
1) Guard Detail and shift. The guard detail comes from A/70 ENG BN and consi
ofEENon-
Commissioned Officer as the COR and
soldiers •er shift. After the guards work ashift they have
off be ore t e next shift.
2) Procedures at the Detention Facility. When a detainee is brought
to the detention
facility, the unit and/or the detainee is required to complete an inprocessing checklist and turn over any physical evidence. This includes name, address, offense, and any medical condition. The severity of the offense determines how the detainees are handled.
a) Curfew violators and minor offenses. These detainees are kept in the courtyard of the facility and have full access to water and a latrine. Normally after 24 hours they are released after completing some manual labor task such as policing a portion of the Battalion
FOB.
b Seriou -
After inprocessing, these detainees
This procedure is followed to prevent detainees from talking to one another before the Military Investigation Team (MIT) has a chance to interrogate them.
3)
Class I for detainees. The detainees are given two humanitarian MREs daily. One
is given for breakfast
between 0700-0800 hours and the other is given for dinner between
1700-1900 hours. Water is usually given every three hours, but is available upon request.

4)
Procedures conducted due to the extreme temperature. The detainees in the cells
are let out at least every three hours to get water, use the latrine, and take a bath. On the
hotter days water is given upon request and the guards attempt to let the detainees out of the
cells more often. The influx of new detainees sometimes prevents letting

than every three hours. them out more often
b. SOP within directed lAD Policy. lAD FRAGO 383A (General Order — Civilian and Detainee Maltreatment) outlines the proper procedures to be followed by all
IAD personnelwhen dealing with Iraqi civilians and/or detainees. Based on my interviews and observations
of the detention facility there is no maltreatment of detainees
evident. The guards are doingeverything within their power to ensure the detainees are well cared for.
2
AETV-THT-XO SUBJECT: Results of AR 15-6 Investigation
c. Detention Facility. The detention facility was an Iraqi jail before the war. It has latrines with showers and toilets, but has no type of environmental control units. The lack of ventilation within the one and two man cells causes the temperature within the cells to be higher than the outside temperature. The cells looked like they had exhaust fans attached to
the windows to help remove some of the heat. After the war the facility was heavily looted and upon U.S. occupation of the facility the electricity/water did not work and most of the fixtures were stolen. 1-13 AR has brought running water and electricity back into the facility.The electricity is limited to lights in every cell and only a few outlets. The Battalion currently has a contractor who is remodeling and upgrading the facility in preparation to turn it over to
the 18 th MP BN.
d. Medical Treatment of detainees. The Battalion Aid Station responds to all medical requests/emergencies from the detention facility. The BN PA stated they have to respond to a request at least once during every shift. The doctor and PA also stated they have treated numerous types of ailments, including dehydration, but never have had to treat someone with
a heat injury.
3. Recommendations.
a. On days when the temperature is extremely high, consider removing the detainees from the cells and letting them into the courtyard. The consideration of intelligence lost due the detainees being able to talk to one another before the MIT can interrogate them has to weighed against the threat of loss of life due to the extreme heat in the cells. Recommend this be considered until the daily temperature decreases to a suitable level. If this is not feasible,
then continue the current procedures.
b.
Continue and if possible accelerate the remodeling of the facility. If the contract does not specify the installation of exhaust fans in the cells either modify the contract or authorize" FOO/CERP money to purchase and install the fans.
c. Consider increasing the guard detail from four to six personnel to allow for
simultaneous operations of inprocessing new detainees and supporting the ones already in the

cells.
d.
Ensure the guards working at the facility are properly trained on first aid and know
how to identify the characteristics of heat injuries.

4. Conclusion. It is my belief that no one at the Detention Facility was the cause of and should not be held liable for the death of Zaid Tariq. This belief is supported by the fact that the CID investigator found no evidence of mistreatment and closed his case. Based on the situation and circumstances at the facility the guards took every precaution to prevent Tariq's death. During my visit to the facility there was no mistreatment of detainees evident in the facility. Water and food is readily available and precautions are taken to reduce the threat ofheat in . uries. Based on the statements of the 3r d BDE Surgeon, MAJ (MD)
andCPT
the fast onset of Tariq's condition was uncharacteristic of a normal heat stroke
AETV-THT-XO
SUBJECT: Results of AR 15-6 Investigation

victim. This is clearly speculation on their part, but there could have been some other medical condition, coupled with the heat, that brought on the death of Tariq. The cause of his death will not be fully determined until the final results of the autopsy is received in three to four
months.
MAJ(P), FA Executive Officer
4
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
HEADQUARTERS, 1ST ARMORED ENVISION
BAGHDAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
APO AE 09324

AETV-THZ
S: 30 Aug 2003 27 Aug 2003
MEMORANDUM FOR MAJ(P) Headquarters, DIVARTY, l m Armored Division,
Baghdad, Iraq
SUBJECT: AR 15-6 Investigation Officer Appointment
1. Appointment. You are appointed as an investigating officer under AR 15-6 (Procedure for Investigation Officers and Boards of Officers). You will investigate the death of an Iraqi detainee, Ziad Al-Hashim Tariq. During a routine check, guards noticed the detainee was in medical distress at approximately 1730 hours on or about 22 Au ust 2003. A preliminary investigation into these events has
already begun. You should contact MAJ
the 3 BCT Judge Advocate, at 551-1111. to
obtain the information already gathered. This investigation is your primary duty and takes precedence
over all other assigned duties.

2. Le al Orientation. Before you begin your investigation, you must receive a briefing from CPT
1 AD Administrative Law Attorney, your legal advisor (DNVT 551is.. You must completeyour legal briefing no later than
ug 2003. You will consult with CPT regarding all aspectsof this investigation. CPT
1.will brief you in the following areas: developing an investigation
plan; determining whether you should advise witnesses of their rights under Article 31, UCMJ, or the
Fifth Amendment of the Constitution; and preparing findings and recommendations. He will also direct
you to the forms and regulations you will need to complete your investigation.

3.
Procedures. You will conduct this investigation using the informal procedures outlined in AR 15-6,
chapter 4. No individual has been named as the respondent at this time. All witnesses will be sworn
before being interviewed by you. If practical, you will interview all witnesses in person, and thoroughly
document all interviews in writing on a DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement). If you come to suspect any
person of committing criminal conduct during the course of this investigation, you must advise that
person of their Article 31 or Fifth Amendment rights, as appropriate. Document rights waivers by
witnesses on a DA Form 3881 (Rights Warning Procedures/Waiver Certificate). You may also need to
provide certain witnesses with Privacy Act statements before you solicit any information from them. You
will maintain a written chronology of your actions on this investigation. 1 strongly encourage you to
consult your legal advisor if you have any questions regarding this procedure.

4.
Conduct of Investigation. The report of investigation must include, but is not limited to, findings on

the following issues:
a.
The cause of death as determined by an Armed Forces Institute of Pathology autopsy or forensicexamination performed on or about 23 August 2003.

b.
Identify any other pertinent duties, responsibilities, and standards in Department of Defense, U.S. Central Command, Army, Combined Forces Land Component Command, ARCENT, V Corps, and Armored Division directives, regulations, policies, standing operating procedures, and other authoritative sources that may be relevant to the allegations, and determine the extent to which individuals involved discharged these duties and responsibilities or upheld these standards.

AETV-THZ
SUBJECT: AR 15-6 Investigation Officer Appointment

c.
Report any other findings and recommendation you deem relevant, to include administrative
and/or disciplinary action you determine may be appropriate.

d.
Maintain a written chronology of your actions on this investigation.

5. Report of Investigation. Submit your findings and recommendations on DA Form 1574 (Report of Proceedings by an Investigation Officer/Board of Officers) to CPT no later than 29 Aug 2003. Submit any requests to change this suspense or the scope of investigation to me in writing through your legal advisor. Submit your investigation in the following order:
a.
DA Form 1574 with sufficient findings and recommendations;

b.
This letter of appointment as Enclosure 1;

c.
Your chronology as Enclosure 2;

d.
Any Privacy Act statements as subsequent Enclosures;

e.
An index of exhibits as the final numbered Enclosure; and

f.
All exhibits labelled in successive order (A, B, C, etc.)

6. Criminal Misconduct. If in the process of this investigation you determine that someone senior to you has engaged in misconduct or that any other factors exist that could raise the appearance of a conflict of interest, report this fact immediately to your legal advisor. If you discover evidence of criminal misconduct during the course of your investigation, immediately notify your legal advisor before
proceeding further.
MARTIN E. DEMPS
Brigadier General
Commanding
DTG
291600AUG03 291800AUG03 291900AUG03 292100AUGO3
292200AUG03 301530AUG03 010900SEP03
011100SEPO3 011130SEP03 011200SEPO3
011320SEP03
01 1330SEP03
021200SEP03

021400SEP03 021500SEPO3 021730SEP03 022000SEP03 031400SEP03
031500SEP03

CHRONOLOGY OF INVESTIGATION
EVENT
Conducted Inbrief with CPT
Contacted 3 rd Bde SJA, MAJ

to get copies of statements
collected during Commander's In
Contacted DIV Deputy SJA, MAJ

for the copies of the
statements.
Received and reviewed Statements from DIV SJA
Downloaded and reviewed DIV FRAGO 383A (General Order — Civilian

or Detainee Maltreatment).

Reviewed statements again and developed questions for the soldiers
involved in the incident.
Contacted DIV SJA for information on how to acquire the autopsy.

Contacted CID Special Agent (SA)

for autopsy report. Contacted MAJ Holycross to get digital photos of detainee and facility. Contacted 1-13 AR to coordinate appointment time to interview the officers and soldiers involved in the incident. Received call from SA
t up appointment.
Conducted interview with SA

and received an Agent's
Investigation Report.
C-onducted interviews at the 3 rd BDE TOC with SGT

and CPT (MD) MI Also, received a Medical Summary from CPT
and
di ital hotos of the detainee and the detention facility from MAJ
-Cbnducted interviews at the 1-13 AR TOC with CPT (MD) CPT(PA)
SGT ....
Conducted interviews at the 1-13 AR TOC with PV2

PFCSGT SPC
and PFC
Conducted walk through with SGT

and took digital photos of
detention facility.
Organized statements/reports and began compiling final AR 15-6 informal

report
Completed AR 15-6.
Turned in final AR 15-6 Investigation Report to CPT

INDEX
EXHIBITS SUBJECT
A
DIV FRAGO 383A (General Order — Civilian or Detainee Maltreatment),dated 21 JUL 03
B

TF 1-13 AR SIR to 3 rd BDE, no date
C Summary of Incident by 3 rd BDE Sur• eon, CPT

no dateD Sworn Statement of SG dated 22 AUG 03 E Sworn Statement of SGT • ated 02 SEP 03 F Sworn Statement of PV2 dated 02 SEP 03

G Sworn Statement of PFC ated 02 SEP 03H Sworn Statement of PFC
d, • 1 SEP 03
Sworn Statement of SGT dated 22 AUG 03

.1
Sworn Statement of CPT dated 22 AUG 03K Sworn Statement of CPT dated 22 AUG 03

L CPT
Standard Form 600 — Chronological Record of Medical Carefor treatment to Zaid Tariq, dated 22 AUG 03 SA
M Investi ation Re ort, dated 01 SEP 03
N
Sworn Statement of MAJ dated 02 SEP 03O Sworn Statement of SGT dated 02 SEP 03
P
Sworn Statement of SP dated 02 SEP 03
Q
Summary Interrogation Report on Zaid Tariq, dated 20 AUG 03
R
Digital Photos of Zaid Tariq (Post Mortem) and the Detention Facility